8 ms·
Agreed. This take is really shallow. Calling Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris Islamophobes is an attempt to shut down the conversation about the shortcomings of Islam,
by finfinfin 4y ago
Agreed. This take is really shallow. Calling Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris Islamophobes is an attempt to shut down the conversation about the shortcomings of Islam, or any other religion in general.
So-called New Atheists are well-known for publicly debating representatives of all major religions, yet for some reason they are not branded as Christianity-phobes.
- iudqnolq 4y ago> Listening to the lovely bells of Winchester, one of our great mediaeval cathedrals. So much nicer than the aggressive-sounding “Allahu Akhbar.” Or is that just my cultural upbringing? - Dawkins
- hulitu 4y ago> Or is that just my cultural upbringing? - Dawkins That is just his uncultural upbringing. First lesson in culture: learn to respect other cultures.
- wawjgreen 4y ago
- randomhodler84 4y agoWhat are you talking about? Atheists are generally far more intelligent than the religious. Something to do with not get caught up in millennial old fairy tales is one, and use of science, reason and logic over lore, superstition and guilt.
- wawjgreen 4y ago
- randomhodler84 4y ago
- wawjgreen 4y ago
- t6jvcereio 4y agoThis is time cube level shit.
- wawjgreen 4y agoyou are no different; he was a schizophrenic and you are just as paranoid--but only in another direction. There is a difference between healthy skepticism and paranoia. And keep your language clean, not every culture likes using that word yours every five seconds.
- t6jvcereio 4y agoHow many sides does a day have?
- wawjgreen 4y agohehehe. my opeeeniooon on your "sides of day" and "time cube" can be best summarized as this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXwRgnZ990I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXwRgnZ990I both are suffering, and it shows.
- adammarples 4y agoThis rambling fails to be a description of atheism or a rebutal of it.
- wawjgreen 4y agoyou need to get a better education in order to sharpen your reading comprehension skills. your comment doesn't add any value to the discussion and seems to reflect your frustration with your life.
- finfinfin 4y ago> if A made B and B made C, who made A? All right. So if god made A, who made god?
- wawjgreen 4y agoyou are proving my assertion that people like you are not intelligent--you are functionally normal at best. So to answer you, i will ask you (in Socratic manner): is time absolute? your question falls apart when there's no time. And time is a function of physical mass. Hence, there is a "time" before time. Got it?