6 ms·
That would paint a huge red target mark on filecoin's back, given that they raised over a quarter-billion. They would take it down faster than you can have an 8
by UkrainianJew 4y ago
That would paint a huge red target mark on filecoin's back, given that they raised over a quarter-billion. They would take it down faster than you can have an 8TB HDD shipped to you.
- betwixthewires 4y agoThey can't take it down.
- jmprspret 4y agoso you're telling me there's CSAM on IPFS that feds "can't" take down? Somehow I doubt that.
- betwixthewires 4y agoSomehow? How? Do you know how IPFS works? They can't take down torrents either. But we were talking about filecoin raking something down from ipfs. They can't do it.
- UkrainianJew 4y agoThey can and will use legal means to go after anyone trying to use the network this way in order to make the content less discoverable and discourage others from following suit. Being coined as the Napster on Blockchain is the worst possible PR one can think of in their situation.
- trasz 4y agoI suspect Russia could now help with this one :-)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- 5560675260 4y agoBut why would it, really? At this point it absolutely plans to rejoin world economy once things "blow over". And if becomes clear that it's not going to happen - there is even less reason to host some books in foreign languages that probably have "extremist" content in them.
- trasz 4y agoBecause they can; same reason anybody else might host it, except for Russia it's easier because you can ignore the law.
- sixtyfourbits 4y agoIPFS is a protocol like bittorrent. The only way to make content inaccessible is to go after the people/computers that are sharing that content.