4 ms·
It shouldn't because the original possessor of the copy still has access to his copy. In principle they are different. Copying is no different morally than sp
by throwawayday 15y ago
It shouldn't because the original possessor of the copy still has access to his copy. In principle they are different. Copying is no different morally than speeding.
- bradharper 15y agoUnless that copy originated with permission of the property owner, or a representing legal agent thereof, then it most certainly is.