4 ms·
But if they are abusing other people, you'd care, and intervention would be justified? Is that not imposing your dogma on them?
by yummies 4y ago
But if they are abusing other people, you'd care, and intervention would be justified? Is that not imposing your dogma on them?
- daseiner1 4y agoI’d assert that an anti-dogma stance is inherently non-dogmatic.
- yummies 4y agoI challenge the assertion that the gp is really antidogmatic. The definition of abuse and the appropriate response to it, while generally unquestioned in one society, may not be the same in a remote island society.
- LocalH 4y agoLet's jump right in the deep end. Let's say you have a remote culture where genital mutilation is done for purely religious reasons. This is done in an unclean fashion, as it's a tribal culture. Would you argue against intervention?
- trhway 4y agoit isn't a dogma, it is my personal dislike of [unconsented] abuse. Depending on situation/domain i may be wrapping it into legal/dogmatic/moral/etc. devices, whatever works, yet in the end at the very core it would be just that my personal dislike of abuse.