7 ms·

You are building too slowly

6 points by jpuopolo 15y ago

lucisferre 15y ago
The software industry may be competitive but this business environment is far more of a land rush than a gold rush. There are more opportunities out there right now than there are talented individuals and groups capable of executing on them. I'm not sure I can agree with the authors conclusion here. The early bird gets the worm is probably more cliche than truth.
- jpuopolo 15y ago
  Fair comment, part of the point of the article is to challenge the notion that it takes X long to build something. I think sometimes we talk ourselves into believing it is going to take longer to build something than it could.
  - lucisferre 15y ago
    That I can possibly agree with, when it is ourselves we are challenging with the deadlines and when we are talking about a launch or not situation. For teams I think that mentality more often than not leads to poor results and quality. Rushing without taking the time needed to do something "right" (I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine what's "right" for them) just isn't sustainable long term. Take Balsamiq which takes the exact opposite stance here: http://blogs.balsamiq.com/team/2011/09/07/pace/ http://blogs.balsamiq.com/team/2011/09/07/pace/ I think that is a far more realistic and sustainable guideline to work from.
    - jpuopolo 15y ago
      I think there is a subtle difference for rushing and coding bad in the process as opposed to be excruciatingly focused on a deadline and thinking of clever ways to do things faster. I will be sure to check out that blog though. Thx
    - jpuopolo 15y ago
      I think there is a subtle difference for rushing and coding bad in the process as opposed to be excruciatingly focused on a deadline and thinking of clever ways to do things faster. I will be sure to check out that blog though. Thx
TheDanLevy 15y ago
Great post by Joseph Puopolo and one that the people at RIM/BlackBerry should really be reading given their announcement of pushing off the PlayBook 2.0 release to February 2012
- jpuopolo 15y ago
  Thanks for the note. That is a perfect example of a company, who just can't afford to wait. The window is closing to turn the tide, if it hasn't closed already.
dfewgoodmen 15y ago
I agree with the premise of the article. The point being advocated is a direct challenge in the way goals are achieved in a set frame of timeline one is apportioned. It shows that you may be more efficient and perhaps more productive if you could push yourself harder. Setting unrealistic goals and achieving it or coming close doing so comes just short of what a philosopher eruditley noted as being of a great mind! That is asking "thinking of things that are not in existence, and asking Why Not?" yes, that's what I truly think Joseph has done here! Challenging the norms and at the same time, proffering his own peculiar solution! Well done, dude!

6 points by jpuopolo 15y ago

The software industry may be competitive but this business environment is far more of a land rush than a gold rush. There are more opportunities out there right now than there are talented individuals and groups capable of executing on them. I'm not sure I can agree with the authors conclusion here. The early bird gets the worm is probably more cliche than truth.

jpuopolo 15y ago
Fair comment, part of the point of the article is to challenge the notion that it takes X long to build something. I think sometimes we talk ourselves into believing it is going to take longer to build something than it could.
- lucisferre 15y ago
  That I can possibly agree with, when it is ourselves we are challenging with the deadlines and when we are talking about a launch or not situation. For teams I think that mentality more often than not leads to poor results and quality. Rushing without taking the time needed to do something "right" (I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine what's "right" for them) just isn't sustainable long term. Take Balsamiq which takes the exact opposite stance here: http://blogs.balsamiq.com/team/2011/09/07/pace/ http://blogs.balsamiq.com/team/2011/09/07/pace/ I think that is a far more realistic and sustainable guideline to work from.
  - jpuopolo 15y ago
    I think there is a subtle difference for rushing and coding bad in the process as opposed to be excruciatingly focused on a deadline and thinking of clever ways to do things faster. I will be sure to check out that blog though. Thx
  - jpuopolo 15y ago
    I think there is a subtle difference for rushing and coding bad in the process as opposed to be excruciatingly focused on a deadline and thinking of clever ways to do things faster. I will be sure to check out that blog though. Thx

TheDanLevy 15y ago

Great post by Joseph Puopolo and one that the people at RIM/BlackBerry should really be reading given their announcement of pushing off the PlayBook 2.0 release to February 2012

jpuopolo 15y ago
Thanks for the note. That is a perfect example of a company, who just can't afford to wait. The window is closing to turn the tide, if it hasn't closed already.

dfewgoodmen 15y ago

I agree with the premise of the article. The point being advocated is a direct challenge in the way goals are achieved in a set frame of timeline one is apportioned. It shows that you may be more efficient and perhaps more productive if you could push yourself harder. Setting unrealistic goals and achieving it or coming close doing so comes just short of what a philosopher eruditley noted as being of a great mind! That is asking "thinking of things that are not in existence, and asking Why Not?" yes, that's what I truly think Joseph has done here! Challenging the norms and at the same time, proffering his own peculiar solution! Well done, dude!