4 ms·
This anonymous, undated article was written by me, yesterday. The strong backwards compatibility of LaTeX(2e) [0] make it so that the date is not especially rel
by miguelmurca 4y ago
This anonymous, undated article was written by me, yesterday. The strong backwards compatibility of LaTeX(2e) [0] make it so that the date is not especially relevant (since I'm using primitives); in any case my point was pedagogical, in the sense of diving into the operational mechanisms of (La)TeX to develop a better mental model of what's going on. And while Pandoc is very nice, if you're in academia none of your alternatives are viable, since LaTeX is a de facto standard for most journals.
Fun fact: the article was written in Markdown, with some front matter for metadata!
[0] https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/247524/do-i-risk-breaking-documents-by-updating-my-tex-distribution https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/247524/do-i-risk-bre...
- leephillips 4y agoI certainly appreciate the pedagogical purpose; what you did there goes beyond any pure TeX programming I’ve ever tried to do. My suggestion was to use Pandoc to create a LaTeX document. You can easily tell it to use RevTeX or any style required by a journal. The only friction with my approach is when you need to work with coauthors or editors on revisions. EDIT: I think I caused some confusion due to my sloppiness. I should have written “constrained to only writing in LaTeX”.
- behnamoh 4y agoHow did you do emojis in pandoc? I’ve had a hard time writing them in md files and converting them to pdf using pandoc
- leephillips 4y agoPandoc uses LaTeX to make the PDF, so you have to set up LaTeX somehow to be able to handle the emoji. I use “normal” Unicode in md source all the time, but not emoji, so, sorry, I don’t know what to do.
- Schiphol 4y agoI am in academia and I do all of my writing in pandoc. I simply submit the .tex file that pandoc outputs if and when the manuscript is accepted. (I liked and learned a lot from your post, just wanted to prevent a possible misunderstanding about the usefulness of pandoc for academic writing).