8 ms·

Plej verŝajne, neniu el vi ĉi tie komprenos ĉi tiun mesaĝon rekte, sen tradukiloj. Tamen, por oni kiuj povas kompreni min, mi devas diri, ke Esperanto vivas tia

• klez 4y ago
  My very rusty Esperanto seems to still be able to get the gist of what you said (and I also understood the little I read of an article on your website). My trouble is that whatever material I used to learn it (mainly Kurso de Esperanto and a course on lernu!) seemed to be completely detached from the way most people seem to actually write. Lots of suffixes I've never seen used in the learning material are abundantly used in the real world. All of this to say, where do I go to learn a bit better?
  • elsjaako 4y ago
    My feeling is that the courses teach you the grammar pretty well, but you have to read (with a dictionary ready) to get more of what you are asking for.
  • ebzzry 4y ago
    One of the best books for that are Esperanto Learning and Using the International Language by David Richardson and Complete Esperanto by Tim Owen.
• demetrius 4y ago
  > Plej verŝajne, neniu el vi ĉi tie komprenos ĉi tiun mesaĝon Vi ne estas tiom unika, kiom vi pensas ;) You're not as unique as you think ;) > Jes, mi jam pruvis, ke la lingvo povas esti uzita en teĥnikaj konceptoj. Ĉiuj lingvoj povas esti uzataj por teĥnikaĵoj, ĉu ne? (Nu, eble krom toki pona) All languages can be used for technical things, aren't they? (Well, maybe except tiki pona)
  • ebzzry 4y ago
    As one may have already noted, that was precisely my goal. When I said no one, I meant it in the metaphorical sense. It’s not actually about uniqueness, but more of being less in numbers.