5 ms·
>NATO was defending Kosovo from a war of aggression and ongoing genocide. Except that Kosovo was not a part of NATO so you can't say that NATO is a defensive a
by walrusfromspace 4y ago
>NATO was defending Kosovo from a war of aggression and ongoing genocide.
Except that Kosovo was not a part of NATO so you can't say that NATO is a defensive alliance unless you are going the Roman way of pre-emptive defence[1].
[1] All Roman wars were officially defensive because they believed gods would not support an offensive war
- simonh 4y agoI have addressed this point in more detail across thread. Defending other people is still defence.