6 ms·
Unfortunately this seems to be expensive for arbitrary use.
by Ataraxy 4y ago
Unfortunately this seems to be expensive for arbitrary use.
- PantaloonFlames 4y agoDid they publish cost estimates?
- topicseed 4y agoit is available at – https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/pricing https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/pricing vCPUs $48.24 / vCPU month Memory $8.18 / GB month Regional cluster storage $0.3 / GB month + network pricing
- phamilton 4y agoFor anyone looking to compare to Aurora: Aurora r6g instances are 1 vCPU per 8GB memory at $0.12978 per vCPU hr. The equivalent on AlloyDB is $0.15568 Aurora x2g instances are 1 vCPU per 16GB memory at $0.1885 per vCPU hr. The equivalent on AlloyDB is $0.24528 Given the additional memory/cache characteristics and the 2x performance claims, I'm guessing you'll want to go memory heavy, so it _might_ not be terrible to say that a 2 vCPU/16GB Aurora instance ($0.26/hr) may perform similarly to a 1 vCPU/16GB AlloyDB instance ($0.24528/hr). Storage is cheaper on AlloyDB and data transfer likely is as well.
- mattashii 4y ago> storage is cheaper on AlloyDB AlloyDB is 0.30$/GB/month Aurora is 0.10$/GB/month Where does Aurora gain 0.20$/GB/month in storage costs?
- phamilton 4y agoMy bad, I misread hourly vs monthly and lost track of zeros. Just a plain miss on my part. However, I/O accounts for far more of our cost on Aurora than storage. It's likely that more than offsets the increased storage cost on AlloyDB.
- nhumrich 4y agoYes, there is a fully fleshed out pricing page.