5 ms·
The MLPerf 1.0 results provided an apples-to-apples comparison of large-scale TPU and GPU systems across several ML workloads: https://cloud.google.com/blog/pro
by zak 4y ago
The MLPerf 1.0 results provided an apples-to-apples comparison of large-scale TPU and GPU systems across several ML workloads:
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/google-wins-mlperf-benchmarks-with-tpu-v4 https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/g...
In MLPerf 1.1, we showcased model training at larger scale:
https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/tpus/google-showcases-cloud-tpu-v4-pods-for-large-model-training https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/tpus/google-showcases-c...
The deep learning workloads that people find most interesting and the underlying hardware and software systems are all changing very rapidly. In addition to following MLPerf, we generally recommend that people run rigorous performance and cost comparisons on the actual workloads that they care about accelerating.