15 ms·

SGX is just some document that a Google employee authored and didn't build consensus enough to standardize (e.g. Firefox/Safari don't support it). It's now an e

SGX is just some document that a Google employee authored and didn't build consensus enough to standardize (e.g. Firefox/Safari don't support it). It's now an expired ietf draft that appears superceded by a different thing. It's also newer than nearly all the technologies used by OP link. > Such a damned pity that so much zealous & righteous energy ... shunted You're projecting

rektide 4y ago
It got renamed in the latest draft. Not sure why it's not at IETF, that sucks, but same stuff. https://wicg.github.io/webpackage/draft-yasskin-httpbis-origin-signed-exchanges-impl.html https://wicg.github.io/webpackage/draft-yasskin-httpbis-orig... > You're projecting Cheap, mean, and vacuous. Trifecta of cruel callousness. What do you know? These are just words posted here but I see myself as trying very much to engage here, to work with what is about & layer enhancement. Sure Im zealous & rigtheous a bit too, but my value call: that too many have a refusenik tear it all down/reject everything/start again destructiveness? That that shunts real progress? That assessment, that hypothesis is not projection. If you want to make a case & not just throw bombs, I'd love the chance for self assessment, but this is just poison right now & low.