>Mac OSX has Time Machine and APIs for in built autosave and versioning. It's not perfect but any sort of backup is good, as is making sure you do not lose your

>Mac OSX has Time Machine and APIs for in built autosave and versioning. It's not perfect but any sort of backup is good, as is making sure you do not lose your work. And the ability to restore accounts from Time Machine is pretty nice. Linux has ??? TimeVault - http://lifehacker.com/275399/timevault-time-machine-for-linux http://lifehacker.com/275399/timevault-time-machine-for-linu... >Mac OSX has Spotlight. I can type in something like "Canon" and get all the pictures I took on my Canon cameras. Linux has ??? Strigi - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strigi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strigi I think that, feature-wise, Macs, Linux and Windows boxes are on about the same page. They all tend to steal ideas from each other and anything missing in the OS will be provided by a third party. I agree that Macs tend to 'just work' but this comes at the expense of only being able to work in a particular way. It's the efficiency vs robustness/flexibility tradeoff. I've heard horror stories about laptop power management on Linux, it could definitely do with some work.