6 ms·
I'm using a fairly experimental JavaScript-driven system right now. It's totally overkill for a blog, but it's my blog and I can do stuff like this for fun. No
by joehewitt 15y ago
I'm using a fairly experimental JavaScript-driven system right now. It's totally overkill for a blog, but it's my blog and I can do stuff like this for fun. No offense, but if you disable JavaScript, you get what you deserve.
- icebraining 15y ago>you get what you deserve A more secure and tracking-free experience? By the way, nothing against that (although I probably won't bother enabling it), but is it doing User-Agent sniffing? Because here in Firefox 6 it loads a normal HTML version.
- pasbesoin 15y agoI love how the industry can spend a decade advocating the separation of form and content, and then in a handful of years go to completely co-mingling the two, at least and especially from the end user perspective. I disable Javascript out of necessity. Having cleaned enough garbage off of others' computers, and having struggled long enough to pay attention despite the "blinkenlights", I find I really have no alternative. Your choice, Joe. Fine, although I don't particularly appreciate the snarky rhetoric. (I find the combination of "No offense..." and "you get what you deserve" to be a rhetorical ploy.)