5 ms·
Okay, the first two are pretty hilarious, but as far as I can tell, the first one doesn't actually set any cookies if you don't react to the banner, and the sec
by msl 4y ago
Okay, the first two are pretty hilarious, but as far as I can tell, the first one doesn't actually set any cookies if you don't react to the banner, and the second one sets just this: "{"cm":false,"all1st":false,"closed":false}", which seems acceptable.
The other two are trickier to judge, but contain (user?) identifiers, which could certainly be used for tracking, so I'll have to concede your point.
Edit: I had to recheck some of the sites I'd previously checked, as your examples helped me realize that my browser does a lot of blocking. It turns out that just one of my examples was actually a good one: https://finlex.fi/en/ https://finlex.fi/en/
Edit2: Found others: https://www.suomi.fi/frontpage https://www.suomi.fi/frontpage and https://vnk.fi/en/frontpage https://vnk.fi/en/frontpage
Both actually do set cookies, but apparently nothing requiring consent.
- throwaway_sb666 4y agoTerve! Not surprised to see Finland slightly ahead of the curve. I think the default is that most people, professionals included, don't understand the law and throw in the banner-spam to be on the safe side or because of outdated checklists. I have zero problem with (edit: first-party) cookies, only with the web being a horrible UX for 95% of people, so hope more official websites can lead the way, so that pop-ups can slowly be de-normalized in peoples minds. Edit: > https://finlex.fi/en/ https://finlex.fi/en/ Nice find. Also: https://oikeusministerio.fi/en/frontpage https://oikeusministerio.fi/en/frontpage Can they inform Denmark? https://www.justitsministeriet.dk/ https://www.justitsministeriet.dk/