4 ms·
I'm not sure I see how this is a fallacy. Can you explain even anecdotally?
by luciferous 15y ago
I'm not sure I see how this is a fallacy. Can you explain even anecdotally?
- javert 15y ago“Most economic fallacies derive from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another.” -Milton Friedman I just googled "Fixed pie fallacy" - I was assuming (probably wrongly) that most people were familiar with it. I'm not even certain Friedman was the first to identify it. The first thing I come up with on Google is [1]. It's a decent overview. [1] http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2006/12/fixed-pie-fallacy.html http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2006/12/fixed-pie-fallacy.html
- davidmathers 15y agoHarvard is not fungible.
- javert 15y agoRight, but top-quality education is fungible. Not everybody needs to go to an Ivy League, just like not everybody needs to own a 75-ft yacht. I'm OK with that.
- chc 15y agoIf the quality we're interested in is "being Harvard," then no, Harvard is not fungible. But if the quality is "providing a college education," the Harvard is extremely fungible in many cases.
- ap22213 15y agoPeople don't seek Harvard for the education only. They seek it or lots of things: access to wealth, access to knowledge and network, increased status, increased reputation. Otherwise why would there be exceptional demand (and price) for harvard?
- luciferous 15y agoSure, there's no disputing that the fixed pie fallacy exists, but you have not made a convincing argument that this situation is an instance of the fallacy.