7 ms·
I wrote a little hobbyist AI project [1] with no neural networks at all and was delighted with how good the results were. Definitely think the field is ready to
by kris-s 5y ago
I wrote a little hobbyist AI project [1] with no neural networks at all and was delighted with how good the results were. Definitely think the field is ready to start incorporating some different approaches.
[1] https://littlefish.fish https://littlefish.fish
Feel free to play around with it.
- Andaith 5y agoI entered 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, and it predicted 1.20, 1.24, 2.24, 4.22, 0.01 so I broke it there, sorry. I also entered 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, and it predicted 55.02, 60.04, 65.07, 70.09, 75.11, which are accurate when rounded :)
- kris-s 5y agohow would you describe the pattern of the first one?
- exdsq 5y agoThe classic Nine 1s, One 2 of course!
- civilian 5y agoTo give littlefish a fair shake at getting the Fibonacci sequence, you should give the input: 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 which it does... kinda poorly with? It biases towards not growing fast enough. 83.59 133.12 205.16 314.04 479.25
- rsaxvc 5y agoPretty neat! Doesn't seem to get periodic functions, sin(PI*N/11) from N=1 to N=20, it fails to cross zero again for me.
- kris-s 5y agoThanks! Yeah it struggles with periodic functions that are wide. For example it successfully crosses zero with sin(PIxN/5) and delivers reasonable results for sin(PIxN/3). For your specific example you would probably need to provide something like N=1 to N=50.
- akkartik 5y agoThe fallacy here is attributing to a technique something that is just a property of a domain. The hallmark of intelligence is that it generalizes. Good results in one domain tell you something about the domain, but absolutely nothing about AI. But this is a classic fallacy that has gotten some very smart people in the past, e.g. https://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/1983/aaai83-059.php https://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/1983/aaai83-059.php
- unnouinceput 5y agoFeels like it's polynomial interpolation
- stormbrew 5y agoLet's find out what the next windows versions will be! input: 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 2.01 2.03 2.1 2.11 3.0 3.1 3.11 3.2 3.5 3.51 95 4.0 98 2000 7 8 8.1 10 11 output: 9.93 28.81 18.84 9.40 20.56
- kris-s 5y agoHow many floppies to install Windows 9.93?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- FeepingCreature 5y agoI asked GPT-J-6B and this was its continuation: ... 7 8 8.1 10 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 12.9 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.9 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.8 14.9 15.0 15.1 15.2 I told it it was a list of Windows versions: - Windows 11 - Windows <new> 12 - Windows 2K - Windows ME - Windows NT 4.0 ... and it repeated old versions from there. I think it thinks the list is alphabetically sorted? I ran a few times at higher temperature: - Windows 11 - Windows 12 - Windows 22 - Windows 31 This is the most interesting one that happened: - Windows 11 - Windows Aora - Windows Avalon - Windows Brooklyn - Windows Candor - Windows Car - Windows Danwaersdakai X4 Respueshwa Eeanalauirk
- maze-le 5y agoDon't forget Windows for Warships: https://www.theregister.com/2007/02/26/windows_boxes_at_sea/ https://www.theregister.com/2007/02/26/windows_boxes_at_sea/
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]