8 ms·
Yes, because Ukraine is not a NATO member. If it was, then as per treaty, the alliance would respond. How is that not clear?
by PankajGhosh 5y ago
Yes, because Ukraine is not a NATO member.
If it was, then as per treaty, the alliance would respond.
How is that not clear?
- pmoriarty 5y agoThere's no guarantee that anyone does anything. The proof is in actions, not words. Treaty or no. If it comes to preventing the end of the world or protecting Ukraine, NATO has already shown it would rather prevent the end of the world.
- CRConrad 5y ago> If it comes to preventing the end of the world or protecting Ukraine, NATO has already shown it would rather prevent the end of the world. That's because NATO hadn't committed to protecting Ukraine. If it had, Putler wouldn't have dared attack. Again: How is that not clear?
- pmoriarty 5y agoCommitments and treaties can and have been broken throughout history. The motivation to save the world from utter destruction gives greater reason than ever before to not start WW3... at least not over Ukraine.. treaty or no.