4 ms·
The phrase "measured on a widely used and scientifically validated personality inventory" jumps out at me. What does that really mean? Myers-Briggs is 'widely
by Triumvark 15y ago
The phrase "measured on a widely used and scientifically validated personality inventory" jumps out at me. What does that really mean?
Myers-Briggs is 'widely used' and proponents would probably argue it has been 'empirically validated' (by this one study no one can reproduce...). Myers-Briggs still lacks the "retest reliability" necessary for this sort of analysis.
In fact, in most personality tests, you'd expect wild swings in personality without drugs, even by just waiting a day.
Stop right here. Go watch Ben Goldacre on "Bad Science:" http://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_battling_bad_science.html http://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_battling_bad_science.h...
Now, stop giving any attention to campy press release results. I don't even really disagree with the thesis here, but without a full description of the methods, and probably a metanalysis of previous work in this field, the 'canned results' buzzers should be ringing loudly in all of our heads.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- mshron 15y agoThey were using the "Big 5" personality inventory, which is generally considered the gold standard in personality psych. Myers-Briggs is not widely used in academia, except maybe at business schools. Five factor models have a neat history too. They were started back in the fifties by taking questionnaire results for the appropriateness of tens of thousands of words and doing dimensionality reduction. That got down to a few hundred dimensions, then further research narrowed it down to dozens, until about thirty-forty years ago when they were narrowed down to five and subjected to more rigorous consistency checks. Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits