> with significantly higher code density. This is not correct and is a known weakness of RISC-V at the moment. The ARM toolchains are really good and have dec

> with significantly higher code density. This is not correct and is a known weakness of RISC-V at the moment. The ARM toolchains are really good and have decades of improvements in them. This is a big issue for those who need to buy ROM in volume. Better tools are coming online though. For example: https://blog.segger.com/code-size-closing-the-gap-between-risc-v-and-arm-for-embedded-applications/ https://blog.segger.com/code-size-closing-the-gap-between-ri... "One of the issues faced by RISC-V developers is that the code density of the RISC-V instruction set for deeply embedded processors does not match that of Cortex-M with existing tools."