Ya I agree; 4 to 40 is more interesting than 100 to 200. I was the fifth employee at my current employer, been through two acquisitions, now sitting at 220+ (n

Ya I agree; 4 to 40 is more interesting than 100 to 200. I was the fifth employee at my current employer, been through two acquisitions, now sitting at 220+ (not all developers). Scaling has been a difficult but rewarding and fun problem to tackle. And damn, somehow I missed the last paragraph where you covered your ass ;) Thanks for pointing that out.