5 ms·
I didn't even know safari can't do webm. I wonder what else safari and WebKit can't do?
by danhab99 5y ago
I didn't even know safari can't do webm. I wonder what else safari and WebKit can't do?
- frizlab 5y agoWebm is supported on Safari/Webkit AFAIK (on iOS the audio codec is supported, not sure about the video one) https://webkit.org/blog/11648/new-webkit-features-in-safari-14-1/ https://webkit.org/blog/11648/new-webkit-features-in-safari-...
- smoldesu 5y agoI don't think the entire codec is supported, either. Last I checked, it's still missing features like WEBM alpha layers.
- jchw 5y agoSafari and Webkit definitely support WebM, but it’s disabled on iOS, making it a bit useless. Of course, it’s enabled on macOS, where Apple has to compete with other browser vendors. This leads me to believe the parent article is on the right track. I’ve heard Opus is supported, but not in Mkv (WebM) or Vorbis containers, making it a bit pointless.
- jchw 5y agoGah, I just reread this and realized the funny mistake I made: Ogg* containers. Not Vorbis. In case anyone is still reading this comment a day later.
- aluminum96 5y agoHardware APIs, such as: bluetooth, MIDI, NFC, ambient light, USB A ton of media codecs. Apple is attached at the hip to the MPAA, and so they only implement standards that generate MPAA royalties such as MPEG and its descendants. Web data storage is in pretty bad shape too. For a while WebSQL was totally broken in Safari, and they are years behind the state-of-the-art APIs.
- dmitriid 5y ago> Hardware APIs, such as: bluetooth, MIDI, NFC, ambient light, USB Firefox doesn't support them either, and like Safari considers them harmful. And for good reasons that Google (who are the sole authors of these Chrome only non-standards) completely ignores.
- royal_ts 5y agoI have not found any "good reasons" in the usual issues you'd find to be honest. Many of those harmful reasons are dealt with and tbh where does it differ that much from normal apps? NFC especially. Also: if there would be any issues then try find solutions for that?
- dmitriid 5y ago> Many of those harmful reasons are dealt with Yes, they are being dealt with because Safari and Firefox are persistent. Chrome just releases them. > where does it differ that much from normal apps "Hey, we know that native apps are a nightmare for privacy and security, why would you oppose making the web more like native " isn't a good argument
- drcongo 5y agoI thought I was going mad reading the previous comments. Thanks for bringing the sane.
- danhab99 5y agoWebapps are already protected with the same privacy and security protocols the browser imposes on webpages. What can a native app possibly do that's such an egregious invasion of privacy that a webpage can't do? Filesystems are encapsulated, hardware apis require permission, and cameras now have a nice active indicator. What can anything possibly do anymore that hasn't been fixed in all of web2?
- dmitriid 5y ago
- easrng 5y agoThey don't allow connections to HTTP localhost from HTTPS sites, unlike Firefox and Chrome.