7 ms·

Amazon tablet: What to expect from the Kindle Fire

25 points by yesreally 15y ago

athoma 15y ago
Firstly, what kind of name is this. Kindle Fire? please. Also no integrated email? I agree, it could possibly be added to the amazon "ecosystem", i mean it is only $300, but still no email? Email messaging is too important today.
- AndrewDucker 15y ago
  This isn't a computing device. It's an Amazon device. The Kindle doesn't do email either.
- senko 15y ago
  "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." (http://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/apple-releases-ipod http://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/apple-releases-ip...)
- bobbles 15y ago
  In an interview with Charlie Rose, Jeff Bezos said his vision for the Kindle is to be the best possible reading experience. Being able to send/receive emails isnt a part of what they want the kindle to be. (Unless people start emailing books to each other.. I guess)
glimmerung 15y ago
The Kindle Fire is not an iPad killer. It's a color Nook killer. The two Kindle models correspond exactly to the two Nook models. The iPad is a different kind of device. Kindle is a reader. The Kindle 3 is an electronic book, the Kindle Fire is more like a magazine. The iPad is a general purpose computer that just happens to be delightfully useable. There is no basis for the assumption the any one of these devices is going to kill the other. Many consumers will want both.
- MatthewPhillips 15y ago
  > The iPad is a general purpose computer Let's not go overboard.
ctdonath 15y ago
Video capabilities will be interesting. iPad can play some 3 full movies and still have battery life to spare.
daniel_solano 15y ago
I keep on hearing the question: is the Fire an iPad killer? Perhaps it's just me, but the two devices seem to have very different purposes. The Fire may sell as well as an iPad, but that doesn't mean it's an iPad killer. Was the iPad a Kindle killer?
- cooperadymas 15y ago
  People seem to have an obsession with "iPad killers" and "iPhone killers." I remember advertisements for the Samsung Instinct tried positioning it as an iPhone killer. Boy were they wrong. The only thing that could kill either of them at this point is Apple screwing up big time. Even then, they would be slow to die. Look at how many times Windows has endured through a major flop of a release. My point is this: unless Amazon is really stupid (which they've shown they are anything but), then they probably are not attempting to release it or promote it as an iPad killer. It's other people that try to set it up that way. My assumption is that they are going after a section of the market that loves the idea of the Kindle, but wants more from it.
- maw 15y ago
  Was the iPad a Kindle killer? It doesn't seem to have been, but no few people were predicting that it would be. When in doubt, I take what people who are paid to write about the tech industry say and assume the opposite.
- jonnathanson 15y ago
  I'm concerned that the Fire is getting a little too close to the iPad. It shouldn't be. That's a strategically scary place to go. To your point, the Fire needs to be sufficiently different from the iPad. So different that consumers don't look at it and simply say "So...it's an iPad without native email?" Or some other rhetorical question to that effect. If people look at this device and think "iPad, but...", then the game's already lost.
  - jrockway 15y ago
    Aren't Macs "PCs, but without a replaceable battery"? They still seem to sell pretty well.

25 points by yesreally 15y ago

Firstly, what kind of name is this. Kindle Fire? please. Also no integrated email? I agree, it could possibly be added to the amazon "ecosystem", i mean it is only $300, but still no email? Email messaging is too important today.

AndrewDucker 15y ago
This isn't a computing device. It's an Amazon device. The Kindle doesn't do email either.
senko 15y ago
"No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." (http://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/apple-releases-ipod http://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/apple-releases-ip...)
bobbles 15y ago
In an interview with Charlie Rose, Jeff Bezos said his vision for the Kindle is to be the best possible reading experience. Being able to send/receive emails isnt a part of what they want the kindle to be. (Unless people start emailing books to each other.. I guess)

glimmerung 15y ago

The Kindle Fire is not an iPad killer. It's a color Nook killer. The two Kindle models correspond exactly to the two Nook models. The iPad is a different kind of device. Kindle is a reader. The Kindle 3 is an electronic book, the Kindle Fire is more like a magazine. The iPad is a general purpose computer that just happens to be delightfully useable. There is no basis for the assumption the any one of these devices is going to kill the other. Many consumers will want both.

MatthewPhillips 15y ago
> The iPad is a general purpose computer Let's not go overboard.

ctdonath 15y ago

Video capabilities will be interesting. iPad can play some 3 full movies and still have battery life to spare.

daniel_solano 15y ago

I keep on hearing the question: is the Fire an iPad killer? Perhaps it's just me, but the two devices seem to have very different purposes. The Fire may sell as well as an iPad, but that doesn't mean it's an iPad killer. Was the iPad a Kindle killer?

cooperadymas 15y ago
People seem to have an obsession with "iPad killers" and "iPhone killers." I remember advertisements for the Samsung Instinct tried positioning it as an iPhone killer. Boy were they wrong. The only thing that could kill either of them at this point is Apple screwing up big time. Even then, they would be slow to die. Look at how many times Windows has endured through a major flop of a release. My point is this: unless Amazon is really stupid (which they've shown they are anything but), then they probably are not attempting to release it or promote it as an iPad killer. It's other people that try to set it up that way. My assumption is that they are going after a section of the market that loves the idea of the Kindle, but wants more from it.
maw 15y ago
Was the iPad a Kindle killer? It doesn't seem to have been, but no few people were predicting that it would be. When in doubt, I take what people who are paid to write about the tech industry say and assume the opposite.
jonnathanson 15y ago
I'm concerned that the Fire is getting a little too close to the iPad. It shouldn't be. That's a strategically scary place to go. To your point, the Fire needs to be sufficiently different from the iPad. So different that consumers don't look at it and simply say "So...it's an iPad without native email?" Or some other rhetorical question to that effect. If people look at this device and think "iPad, but...", then the game's already lost.
- jrockway 15y ago
  Aren't Macs "PCs, but without a replaceable battery"? They still seem to sell pretty well.