Regardless of how eloquently they describe the .envs "problem" I was completely thrown off by their "we're doing it better" conclusion at the end. And with zero

Regardless of how eloquently they describe the .envs "problem" I was completely thrown off by their "we're doing it better" conclusion at the end. And with zero explanations on how their service is any better. I left the article questioning myself the validity of their previous claims, knowing that all along I was reading a self promotion piece. Left a sour taste in my mouth. A disclaimer at the top would have been the proper thing to do... [edit]: horrible phone autocorrections