Not sure what your point is. C doesn't have labelled loops, so a goto signals intent better than the weird exitloop=1 thing in the article. This isn't to say C

Not sure what your point is. C doesn't have labelled loops, so a goto signals intent better than the weird exitloop=1 thing in the article. This isn't to say C shouldn't have labelled loops; I think they're better than gotos, it's just that the C committee will likely never add them one of C's philosophies (goals?) is to limit syntactic sugar.