6 ms·
"There is still no turnkey solution for UX" What would that even look like? Do they expect a unified UX language from the Gov t?
by georgesequeira 5y ago
"There is still no turnkey solution for UX"
What would that even look like? Do they expect a unified UX language from the Gov
t?
- Androider 5y agoThe UK has https://www.gov.uk/service-toolkit https://www.gov.uk/service-toolkit and https://design-system.service.gov.uk/ https://design-system.service.gov.uk/
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- systemvoltage 5y ago
- shotgun 5y agoPerhaps like USWDS? https://designsystem.digital.gov/ https://designsystem.digital.gov/
- dylanz 5y agoIt definitely looks like USWDS, which happens to have accessibility well baked in.
- mxuribe 5y agoIt has been years since i have had to manage web design stuff...but as i recall, section 508 specifically calls for federal-centric web properties to - by law - include accessibility features to accomodate the American Disabilities Act (the ADA). So, yeah, it better damn well have accessibility baked in, else it would be illegal. :-) To be fair, the little documentation and blog posts here and there that i have read on the US Digital Service is that those folks reaslly are attentive to design considerations for always including accessbility...which is awesome!!
- llimllib 5y agoThis site uses the USWDS
- canniballectern 5y agoI wonder if what they meant was "it's impossible to have a turnkey solution for UX"? There are all sorts of turnkey solutions for frontend and backend infrastructure, but none guarantee good user experiences - only a team that knows their users' needs and is empowered to meet them can do that.
- paulsmith 5y agoYes, this is exactly what I meant to write, but stated less clearly than you did. Thanks.