Wikipedia isn't a "global source of truth" anyway, so i'm not sure what they're worried about. They've got serious biases and underrepresentation, and they're k

Wikipedia isn't a "global source of truth" anyway, so i'm not sure what they're worried about. They've got serious biases and underrepresentation, and they're kind of under the control of a cabal of elite Wikipedian feudal lords who shove out the majority of outsider attempts to introduce content that doesn't fit their worldview. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Systemic_bias#List_of_Internet_users_by_country https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Systemic_bias#List_o... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_studies_about_Wikipedia#A_minority_of_editors_produce_the_majority_of_persistent_content https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_studies_about_Wikiped...