9 ms·
I don't understand the anger about the VPN. I think it's a good idea. Reader mode is useful, especially if you block a lot of CSS and JavaScript by default with
by a5aAqU 5y ago
I don't understand the anger about the VPN. I think it's a good idea. Reader mode is useful, especially if you block a lot of CSS and JavaScript by default with uMatrix.
I don't know why people use DOH anyway. It bypasses your hosts file, so you can't block things as easily.
- uraniumjelly 5y ago>It bypasses your hosts file It doesn't bypass my hosts file... I have a couple of locally hosted websites that I have rules in /etc/hosts for, and Firefox resolves them correctly even with DOH enabled.
- bayindirh 5y agoIt might be falling back to hosts for them or if they're ending with .local or .home, it's hitting hosts file first for them.
- faeyanpiraat 5y agoYou can locally host .com aswell
- bayindirh 5y agoYes, but I'm talking about this: https://serverfault.com/a/937808 https://serverfault.com/a/937808
- zaarn 5y agoIt's not, Firefox will still check your hosts file to see if it can resolve that way. DoH is used only if using a local-only resolver doesn't work to my knowledge. Otherwise stuff like SMBIOS, Avahi/ZC or mDNS would break too.
- a5aAqU 5y agoWhen DOH was first enabled, it bypassed all the blocked domains my hosts file (Ubuntu). I don't know if it has changed.
- qwerty456127 5y ago> I don't know why people use DOH anyway. To make it slightly less visible what websites do you visit. To bypass DNS-based censoring some ISPs deploy as some governments require them.
- a5aAqU 5y agoThat's what the VPN is for. People keep saying that they want to donate money to Mozilla. You can sign up for Firefox Private Network or Mozilla VPN for much better results than DOH, and give them a little money at the same time. https://fpn.firefox.com/ https://fpn.firefox.com/
- michaelanckaert 5y agoFully agree with reader mode, it's an integral part of the browser. VPN not so much IMO.
- a5aAqU 5y agoMany people wouldn't otherwise sign up for a VPN, and there are a lot of shady VPNs out there. Mozilla can use the feature to help reduce dependence on a company that has been trying to destroy them for years (Google), and help non-tech people get set up with a VPN.
- asteroidbelt 5y agoGoogle is the largest financial supporters in Firefox, they buy Firefox search bar. If they wanted to destroy Firefox, they’d already do it by simply cutting that revenue stream.
- PicassoCTs 5y agoThey are the amd to my intel, their inability to overthrow me, completes monopoly-me.
- asteroidbelt 5y agoThere's enough Chrome alternatives to be considered "amd to my intel": Chrome based browsers like Brave, and Safari.
- boomboomsubban 5y agoOr some other search engine would become their revenue stream, like when Yahoo was the default search. Without Google bidding their revenue would likely drop, but it wouldn't disappear.
- asteroidbelt 5y agoTrue. But revenue would be significantly smaller (other engines cannot afford pay high per click, and lack of competition drives the price per click down), and revenue is already barely enough to cover Mozilla needs (see recent staff cuts).
- wink 5y agoIt nags me all the time when opening a new container. I couldn't care less if it was a feature that I had to click away once, but it is really pushing and in your face.
- a5aAqU 5y agoSo people should push Mozilla to add an about:config flag to turn it off, if it doesn't already exist. The solution is much simpler than demanding that Mozilla completely stop trying to find a way to reduce dependence on Google.
- oefrha 5y ago> Reader mode Pretty sure they meant Pocket when referring to a “bookmark reader”.
- qwerty456127 5y agoPocket lacks some important features I want it to have so I decided negative when considering a paid subscription. Nevertheless I still like it and am glad it exists. It (pocket-based home page) also is my secondary major source of news about the world and curious facts (HN being the primary).
- oefrha 5y agoI’m sure it is useful to some people, heck I used it for a year or two before Mozilla had anything to do with it. That said I fail to see any reason Firefox should acquire it and make it first party. Might as well acquire a webmail, a feed aggregator and a video host while they were at it.
- qwerty456127 5y ago> I fail to see any reason Firefox should acquire it Because it was profitable perhaps? Why not acquire a relevant profitable business (many already like) just for sake of profits? And pre-installing it by default seems the next obvious step to make it even more profitable. > Might as well acquire a webmail, a feed aggregator and a video host while they were at it. It's way harder to make these profitable without too much investment and without using severe user-annoying techniques. Nevertheless it's already been suggested here a number of times that Mozilla should perhaps also re-invent e-mail.
- a5aAqU 5y agoIt literally takes only two clicks to remove Pocket from the toolbar. People need to stop complaining about little things like that.
- agumonkey 5y agoOne thing though, most of these new features are mitigations of annoyances (popups, crazy formatting, too much js, lack of privacy). It's odd how devs are spending time to fight against something rather than the opposite.