13 ms·
4K isn't dense enough for proper 2x scaling at that size though. You have to go fractional, which is okay, but not great.
by jagger27 5y ago
4K isn't dense enough for proper 2x scaling at that size though. You have to go fractional, which is okay, but not great.
- wswope 5y agoYeah, who could ever imagine using a 1080p 32” monitor…
- BoorishBears 5y agoIt's pretty awful. I got Dell's "5k" ultrawide before the XDR, and at the time M1 Macbooks couldn't do fractional scaling at that high of a resolution. The result was essentially a wider 32" 1080p screen. And while the text was crisp, the space efficiency was absolutely awful. I can't even imagine the 16:9 version of that...
- wswope 5y agoI was originally making a snide joke (sorry) since it’s a popular form factor, and I can’t think of a better common option for 2x scaling than 4k 32”… but on review, I actually take your point on space efficiency, if we’re talking about it as a primary display.
- jagger27 5y agoI find 1080p at 27" to be comically big, let alone 32". Maybe my eyes are still young though.