6 ms·
It's not meaningless to imply that inaction is illegal.
by addingnumbers 5y ago
It's not meaningless to imply that inaction is illegal.
- endisneigh 5y agoHow exactly did it imply that?
- addingnumbers 5y agoI can't imagine any other purpose for citing a law that carries penalties for failure to respond while you invite a response.
- endisneigh 5y agoYes, but whether or not it’s explicitly stated doesn’t really change the law. Ultimately I don’t really get the big deal. It takes 5 minutes to reply to this, and if you don’t unless you’re some huge organization no one is going to waste resources bringing you to court. It’s not that they’re implying that it is illegal - it’s that it is.