7 ms·

> When asked to grade the severity of symptoms on a scale from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (significant symptoms), 42% (33/79) reported level 3 symptoms, whereas 11% (

> When asked to grade the severity of symptoms on a scale from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (significant symptoms), 42% (33/79) reported level 3 symptoms, whereas 11% (9/79) reported level 4 symptoms. None of the cases required hospitalisation up to 13 December 2021. I am extremely optimistic.

pixiemaster 5y ago
in terms of covid hospitalisations overwhelming our hospitals: i‘m optimistic as well that this might not happen at scale. but in terms of a large part of society getting sick (level 3 still makes you stick in bed) at the same time - this will lead to worker shortage - i’m kind of neutral-pessimistic. in terms of longterm long covid effect on our demographic - i’m fearful. in terms of society getting their act together to avert anything of this: absolutely pessimistic.
- toolz 5y ago
  I can't stress enough how dangerous it is to pretend society can end a virus that is not only incredibly contagious between humans but also has many animal carriers. There is nothing more dangerous than society with no trust and this completely fabricated idea that people's behavior is to blame for the continued existence of covid serves no purpose other than to erode trust.
  - impendingchange 5y ago
    How did humanity ever survive this long without modern medicine?
    - throwaway894345 5y ago
      Well, a lot of people died, mostly.
    - dahfizz 5y ago
      By letting people die. If covid came around in the 1200s, then everyone would have gotten it and ~3% of the world population would have died. Definitely suboptimal but nowhere near an extinction event.
      - nradov 5y ago
        The infection fatality rate was never as high as 3%. The CDC estimated it at 0.6% back when almost no one was vaccinated.
        astura 5y ago
        Nobody said it was? The question was about a world without modern medicine. It's totally reasonable to speculate there would be a higher fatality rate without medical intervention keeping people from dying.
      - jtc331 5y ago
        Given COVID’s risk/age relationship and already lower life spans in that time period plus higher vitamin D exposure rates it’s quite likely rate of death would have been lower in that population.
    - bostik 5y ago
      Law of large numbers. The widespread plagues of the past were never 100% lethal, or we wouldn't be here - a sizable fraction of the population survived, and over several rounds of infection/reinfection gained something we'd think of sterilising immunity. In the meanwhile, the plagues and their knock-on effects may have eliminated approximately HALF of the entire population of their times.[0] 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death ("is estimated to have killed 30 percent to 60 percent of the European population")
- tim333 5y ago
  The thing with the worker shortage is it'll be brief. SA's already peaked. We'll have maybe a month of worker shortage I guess.
- zrail 5y ago
  > in terms of covid hospitalisations overwhelming our hospitals: i‘m optimistic as well that this might not happen at scale. I see no reason for this optimism. Every hospital that I know of in SE Michigan has been over capacity for several weeks. We have gotten regular emails from both hospital systems in Ann Arbor begging everyone to get vaccinated.
  - toolz 5y ago
    This is inaccurate https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98159-523641--,00.html https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98159-5236...
    - skuhn 5y ago
      Above 75% is roughly considered to be high occupancy. Efficiency drops at that point for various reasons, such as the difficulty in moving patients between units due to a lack of beds. These numbers are also comprised of large regions of the state with multiple facilities, but the facilities still operate independently. For adults, those regions of Michigan have the following ICU utilizations: Region 1: 90% Region 2N: 82% Region 2S: 89% Region 3: 94% Region 5: 85% Region 6: 87% Region 7: 94% Region 8: 72% The NYT compiles per-hospital stats at [1], although the data is incomplete. If Detroit were to not have beds available for patients, one option might be to transport patients as far away as Cleveland. There's a recent article discussing the situation at the Cleveland Clinic's 64 bed MICU [2]. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-hospitals-near-you.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-hospitals-... [2] https://fox59.com/news/national-world/not-gonna-make-it-out-of-this-hospital-what-staffers-see-inside-the-cleveland-clinic-icu/ https://fox59.com/news/national-world/not-gonna-make-it-out-...
    - ianhawes 5y ago
      Most people don’t realize that hospitals typically run at 98%+ capacity in the winter in a pre-COVID environment. This maximizes their profitability and allows them to operate relatively at a loss for the rest of the year.
bipson 5y ago
All this talk about "mild" cases with Omicron are failing to grasp the whole situation at two very important corners: - countries affected so far have excellent immunization rates, i.e. if I take these populations as a reference, I'm just checking how immunized people are affected. Not every country has had either a lot of cases or large/successful immunization programs - if the transmission rate in South Afrika and GB is any indication (reminder, both have quite good immunization rates), there will still be enough severe cases, because there will be just an unbelievable amount of overall cases in a very short timeframe and even with Omicron and a well immunized population, some remaining x% will land in the hospital. I would argue that at the rate Omicron currently growing in GB, NL, DK, NO, etc. this thing will go on a rampage all over Europe. The amount of spread virus is so much not comparable to Delta getting to populations that were so far better protected, i.e. child care, elderly care, etc. Countries like Germany and Austria are seriously in for a ride. Yes, I'm quite pessimistic here and I really hope I am wrong.
- impendingchange 5y ago
  0 out of 79 cases requiring hospitalization? If we assumed a _generous_ vaccination rate of, say, 80% for SA or GB, then we could say that 16 of these cases are with unvaccinated individuals. So, 0 out of 16 is still pretty good for no hospitalizations. Or am I figuring this wrong?
  - bipson 5y ago
    Infection also leads to immunization. Both GB and SA had considerably higher incidence numbers over the last 12 months than most of the EU, with GB running a very successful vaccination program. Particularly in SA researches estimate that almost anyone has had one or more infections in the last 24 months.
  - greatpatton 5y ago
    96% of the participants were fully vaccinated.
- jtc331 5y ago
  South Africa has extremely low vaccination rates, correct? Edit: Yes, your premise seems to be quite wrong. South Africa has only 26% vaccination rate.
funcDropShadow 5y ago
Even if Omicron infected patients have half the rate of hospitalization as delta infected patients, that means the wave crushes the hospitals one doubling period later. Currently, the incidents numbers for omicron double every 2 to 4 days. So having less severe cases means the meteor will hit us a few days later. That is not a big improvement. For the individual risk of hospitalization, it is quite significant.
- tim333 5y ago
  In practice it's worked out ok https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottGottliebMD/status/1472664060445569026 https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottGottliebMD/status/1472664060...

pixiemaster 5y ago

in terms of covid hospitalisations overwhelming our hospitals: i‘m optimistic as well that this might not happen at scale. but in terms of a large part of society getting sick (level 3 still makes you stick in bed) at the same time - this will lead to worker shortage - i’m kind of neutral-pessimistic. in terms of longterm long covid effect on our demographic - i’m fearful. in terms of society getting their act together to avert anything of this: absolutely pessimistic.

toolz 5y ago
I can't stress enough how dangerous it is to pretend society can end a virus that is not only incredibly contagious between humans but also has many animal carriers. There is nothing more dangerous than society with no trust and this completely fabricated idea that people's behavior is to blame for the continued existence of covid serves no purpose other than to erode trust.
- impendingchange 5y ago
  How did humanity ever survive this long without modern medicine?
  - throwaway894345 5y ago
    Well, a lot of people died, mostly.
  - dahfizz 5y ago
    By letting people die. If covid came around in the 1200s, then everyone would have gotten it and ~3% of the world population would have died. Definitely suboptimal but nowhere near an extinction event.
    - nradov 5y ago
      The infection fatality rate was never as high as 3%. The CDC estimated it at 0.6% back when almost no one was vaccinated.
      - astura 5y ago
        Nobody said it was? The question was about a world without modern medicine. It's totally reasonable to speculate there would be a higher fatality rate without medical intervention keeping people from dying.
    - jtc331 5y ago
      Given COVID’s risk/age relationship and already lower life spans in that time period plus higher vitamin D exposure rates it’s quite likely rate of death would have been lower in that population.
  - bostik 5y ago
    Law of large numbers. The widespread plagues of the past were never 100% lethal, or we wouldn't be here - a sizable fraction of the population survived, and over several rounds of infection/reinfection gained something we'd think of sterilising immunity. In the meanwhile, the plagues and their knock-on effects may have eliminated approximately HALF of the entire population of their times.[0] 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death ("is estimated to have killed 30 percent to 60 percent of the European population")
tim333 5y ago
The thing with the worker shortage is it'll be brief. SA's already peaked. We'll have maybe a month of worker shortage I guess.
zrail 5y ago
> in terms of covid hospitalisations overwhelming our hospitals: i‘m optimistic as well that this might not happen at scale. I see no reason for this optimism. Every hospital that I know of in SE Michigan has been over capacity for several weeks. We have gotten regular emails from both hospital systems in Ann Arbor begging everyone to get vaccinated.
- toolz 5y ago
  This is inaccurate https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98159-523641--,00.html https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98159-5236...
  - skuhn 5y ago
    Above 75% is roughly considered to be high occupancy. Efficiency drops at that point for various reasons, such as the difficulty in moving patients between units due to a lack of beds. These numbers are also comprised of large regions of the state with multiple facilities, but the facilities still operate independently. For adults, those regions of Michigan have the following ICU utilizations: Region 1: 90% Region 2N: 82% Region 2S: 89% Region 3: 94% Region 5: 85% Region 6: 87% Region 7: 94% Region 8: 72% The NYT compiles per-hospital stats at [1], although the data is incomplete. If Detroit were to not have beds available for patients, one option might be to transport patients as far away as Cleveland. There's a recent article discussing the situation at the Cleveland Clinic's 64 bed MICU [2]. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-hospitals-near-you.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-hospitals-... [2] https://fox59.com/news/national-world/not-gonna-make-it-out-of-this-hospital-what-staffers-see-inside-the-cleveland-clinic-icu/ https://fox59.com/news/national-world/not-gonna-make-it-out-...
  - ianhawes 5y ago
    Most people don’t realize that hospitals typically run at 98%+ capacity in the winter in a pre-COVID environment. This maximizes their profitability and allows them to operate relatively at a loss for the rest of the year.

bipson 5y ago

All this talk about "mild" cases with Omicron are failing to grasp the whole situation at two very important corners: - countries affected so far have excellent immunization rates, i.e. if I take these populations as a reference, I'm just checking how immunized people are affected. Not every country has had either a lot of cases or large/successful immunization programs - if the transmission rate in South Afrika and GB is any indication (reminder, both have quite good immunization rates), there will still be enough severe cases, because there will be just an unbelievable amount of overall cases in a very short timeframe and even with Omicron and a well immunized population, some remaining x% will land in the hospital. I would argue that at the rate Omicron currently growing in GB, NL, DK, NO, etc. this thing will go on a rampage all over Europe. The amount of spread virus is so much not comparable to Delta getting to populations that were so far better protected, i.e. child care, elderly care, etc. Countries like Germany and Austria are seriously in for a ride. Yes, I'm quite pessimistic here and I really hope I am wrong.

impendingchange 5y ago
0 out of 79 cases requiring hospitalization? If we assumed a _generous_ vaccination rate of, say, 80% for SA or GB, then we could say that 16 of these cases are with unvaccinated individuals. So, 0 out of 16 is still pretty good for no hospitalizations. Or am I figuring this wrong?
- bipson 5y ago
  Infection also leads to immunization. Both GB and SA had considerably higher incidence numbers over the last 12 months than most of the EU, with GB running a very successful vaccination program. Particularly in SA researches estimate that almost anyone has had one or more infections in the last 24 months.
- greatpatton 5y ago
  96% of the participants were fully vaccinated.
jtc331 5y ago
South Africa has extremely low vaccination rates, correct? Edit: Yes, your premise seems to be quite wrong. South Africa has only 26% vaccination rate.

funcDropShadow 5y ago

Even if Omicron infected patients have half the rate of hospitalization as delta infected patients, that means the wave crushes the hospitals one doubling period later. Currently, the incidents numbers for omicron double every 2 to 4 days. So having less severe cases means the meteor will hit us a few days later. That is not a big improvement. For the individual risk of hospitalization, it is quite significant.

tim333 5y ago
In practice it's worked out ok https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottGottliebMD/status/1472664060445569026 https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottGottliebMD/status/1472664060...