6 ms·
That's not plausible
by libeclipse 5y ago
That's not plausible
- wizzwizz4 5y agoHey, just because it would get laughed out of court, that doesn't mean they can't claim it!
- randomluck040 5y agoI‘m not so sure about it being laughed out of court unfortunately.
- donkeyd 5y agoCan concur, courts don't know jack about tech and have to rely on experts that aren't always independent.
- wizzwizz4 5y agoRebutting the argument doesn't rely on tech knowledge. “But, your honour, I didn't copy this person's book! I used the autocomplete on my phone, and it just so happened to produce their 500 000 word novel!” You need tech knowledge to think that's even plausible. Sure, they wouldn't dismiss it out of hand (I think “laughed out of court” is a figure of speech), but I wouldn't be surprised if it got a few giggles.
- ShrigmaMale 5y agoThis would be more like GPT-3 completing a specific novel.