5 ms·

> Tesla’s official response to the clip is that the auto high beam system still is classified as beta software, meaning it’s not fully developed Things like th

> Tesla’s official response to the clip is that the auto high beam system still is classified as beta software, meaning it’s not fully developed Things like this (and panel gap, and build quality, and over promising features) are why I have yet to buy a tesla, and likely won't any time soon. Even though they were the only viable luxury electric car (during my last car search), I decided to pass. I will probably seriously re-evaluate them for my next car purchase, but right now, no thanks! BTW, I got my first demo of tesla FSD a few weeks ago. In san francisco, on market street, a place I'm sure is tested extensively. Within minutes, FSD had the car perform an illegal AND dangerous mid intersection merge followed by an extremely hard and jerky lane follow correction. lol.

rand49an 5y ago
Are they though the only one available though? Both Mercedes and Volvo (Via the Polestar 2) seem to have pretty decent options that match most of Tesla's features and seem more polished and better built. They won't drive themselves but Tesla's don't seem to do a great job of that either.
- renzo88 5y ago
  Sorry! To be clear, at the time I purchased my car, there weren't any that ticked off the boxes I was looking for. Teslas were the only ones that did, that were also electric. If I were to buy an electric car today, i would probably consider a polestar, taycan, audi, tesla. I would give them a fair shake! I'd probably end up with the taycan though, tbh. I would rather wait a year or two though, there's some really interesting things coming down the pipeline.
- thebruce87m 5y ago
  Does the Audi e-tron count too?
- KennyBlanken 5y ago
  Here is Tesla's problem, in a nutshell: https://youtu.be/xwHu9xPsE3U?t=302 https://youtu.be/xwHu9xPsE3U?t=302 Telsa used to be the cool kid because their cars were fast-charging, neck-snapping fast, had autopilot, and were very efficient per-mile. It was enough to make up for the assembly/initial quality, material quality and NVH issues in the interior, poor reliability, and for some models, very dated design. Now they're being beaten in almost every category. GM has one of the best fully automatic cruise control systems now; Mercedes has full self driving on the autobahn. Many cars are as or more efficient per-mile, out-accelerate all but the most expensive Teslas, have as fast or faster DC charging systems. The Audi e-tron and Porsche match or out-accelerate them while having top-of-the-market build quality and design; stepping into any modern Porsche is a like stepping into a swiss watch. Lucid's car out-accelerates and screams "FUTURE!" There are a ton of good EVs out or coming out in the next year or two. All of those cars are assembled better, are more reliable, have nicer interiors, less dated designs, are backed by much more extensive dealer/service/parts networks, etc. Ultimately Musk's problem is that he thought he could to better at building cars than companies which have been building cars for a century. The problem wasn't that car companies couldn't do better than Tesla; it's that they didn't want to. Now that EVs are a Thing, they want to. They have more cash, more manufacturing capacity, more R&D, more dealers, better supply chains, and much better relations with the media and automotive press. Tesla is fucked long-term. I suspect Musk's plan is to pivot to being an energy/charging company - that Tesla cars were just a vehicle to get him a worldwide charger network and accompanying infrastructure (it's the one thing that Tesla does just about flawlessly.)
  - renzo88 5y ago
    >Tesla is fucked long-term. I suspect Musk's plan is to pivot to being an energy/charging company - that Tesla cars were just a vehicle to get him a worldwide charger network and accompanying infrastructure (it's the one thing that Tesla does just about flawlessly.) This was always my take as well. He wants to make cars (they're a halo product), but the real value of tesla is in skateboards, batteries, charging. I suspect that things like the roadster/cybertruck are tesla preparing to transition to a business model where car sales are not the largest part of their business.
  - Sohcahtoa82 5y ago
    > GM has one of the best fully automatic cruise control systems now; Mercedes has full self driving on the autobahn. Compare either of these to Tesla's Autopilot (Which is NOT the same as FSD!). I'd be surprised if there were significant differences. > Many cars are as or more efficient per-mile, Are they, though? I dunno about other cars, but the Taycan is extremely inefficient. The Taycan 4S Performance Battery Plus has a 93 kwh battery, but only 227 mile EPA estimated range. Meanwhile, my Model 3 Performance is 75 kwh, but EPA rated 300 miles. > out-accelerate all but the most expensive Teslas And significantly more expensive. > have as fast or faster DC charging systems That are fewer and farther between, not to mention expensive, and also I'm not sure about the faster part. The latest gen superchargers are up to 250 kW. I can drive on any Interstate highway in the continental USA and not have to worry about where to charge. Even the I-90 corridor across over 1,500 miles of rural highway has enough Superchargers on it to make a road trip viable. That all said... In the long term, you may be right. But we're still 5+ years away from their downfall. The other manufacturers have REALLY been dragging their feet on making good EVs. Honda could be selling tens (or even hundreds) of thousands of fully electric Civics and CRVs, but don't because ????.
    - MBCook 5y ago
      You should look up the new Mercedes system. If you haven’t heard about it it only functions up to like 37 mph, but it’s level three self driving. The kind where the driver doesn’t have to monitor it. So where it can work (map freeways) it can completely take over in slow traffic. Pretty impressive. I agree with you about the 5+ years thing. Ford released an EV that they basically never advertised and got swamped with orders. They announced the next one and got even MORE swamped because it was the F150. They’ve had to delay the introduction of at least two more EV models just to try and keep up with demand for the first two. My understanding is VW has been doing extremely well with the ID.4. I know there is heavy interest in the Kia Niro and the Cadillac Lyriq and of course the new Hummer. Other newcomers like Rivian and Lucid are pulling a lot of eyes/orders. Tesla owned the EV segment because outside the Volt/Bolt/Leaf there was nothing else. Certainly those aren’t equivalent to the S/X/Y or even 3. But the question is, can Tesla improve faster than the rest of the entire automotive industry can move to EVs. I doubt it. In some ways this feels like a double disruption. Tesla came along and disrupted car manufacturing I proving that EVs could work and were even popular/desirable. They also proved online car buying could be quite successful. But I think they will now be disrupted by the companies they tried to replace. I just don’t see how they can hold off every single major car company in the world. They may have the most efficient cars (from my understanding) and they’ve obviously got the whole over the air update thing figured out. But they don’t make enough models to cover everyone’s taste and they still have some real manufacturing/customer service issues that they could have grown a out of by now if they had wanted to. I feel like they may have spread themselves much too thin, and lost their chance at king of the hill because of it. In my mind they’ll never be a VW or Toyota sized car manufacturer in the long term. But will they be as big as Audi? Or just a Jaguar? Or gone like Pontiac? Don’t know. Bankruptcy? Merger? Acquisition? Exit the consumer market? Will be interesting to watch.
Brakenshire 5y ago
Five years ago there was nothing else, but now there are many options.
misiti3780 5y ago
You're missing out, they are making great cars!
- renzo88 5y ago
  I notice that you said not that "my tesla is great" but that "they are great". Do you own one? I will not purchase a car that has a panel gap I can fit my pinky in. I will not purchase a car that is at the bottom of reliability ratings. I will not purchase a car without radar sensors for the adaptive cruise control. Regardless, I ended up buying a faf bmw and I'm loving it. So I did okay, anyways.
  - misiti3780 5y ago
    Yes, 2020 M3 - I have had zero problems in 30K miles. I think there is a misconception that there are a lot of Tesla owners that are not satisfied with their purchases - It seems to me they are a tiny (albeit vocal) minority.
evo_9 5y ago
I find it interesting when people list things like 'panel gap' as a reason they won't buy a car. I grew up in Detroit and honestly it's pretty embarrassing the stuff that goes on with most Big 4 cars. Case in point - my sister worked from one for ~30 years and still gets a 'green sheet discount' so she loyally buys their brand still. it's comical how every time she gets a new car something pretty significant goes wrong within 6 months. This time, her 3 week old Jeep bricked itself because the key fob wouldn't communicate with the car and refused to start. The emergency break also suffered a software failure that refuses to unlock the break. The panel gaps though were spot on. Whew.
- renzo88 5y ago
  Panel gap matters because it is a clear indicator of manufacturing precision, and it also affects weather proofing. It is a very strong signal (but not the only one!) Most people buy cars based on brands, and also a very substantial amount of car purchases are impulse purchases. Anecdotally, I rented a jeep a few months ago (compass) and it was truly abysmal.
- cirrus3 5y ago
  Panel gap is expected on crap "most Big 4 cars"
Fatnino 5y ago
Is a mid intersection merge illegal in California? The drivers handbook only says that if you start into an intersection you need to finish crossing. Nothing about what lane.

rand49an 5y ago

Are they though the only one available though? Both Mercedes and Volvo (Via the Polestar 2) seem to have pretty decent options that match most of Tesla's features and seem more polished and better built. They won't drive themselves but Tesla's don't seem to do a great job of that either.

renzo88 5y ago
Sorry! To be clear, at the time I purchased my car, there weren't any that ticked off the boxes I was looking for. Teslas were the only ones that did, that were also electric. If I were to buy an electric car today, i would probably consider a polestar, taycan, audi, tesla. I would give them a fair shake! I'd probably end up with the taycan though, tbh. I would rather wait a year or two though, there's some really interesting things coming down the pipeline.
thebruce87m 5y ago
Does the Audi e-tron count too?
KennyBlanken 5y ago
Here is Tesla's problem, in a nutshell: https://youtu.be/xwHu9xPsE3U?t=302 https://youtu.be/xwHu9xPsE3U?t=302 Telsa used to be the cool kid because their cars were fast-charging, neck-snapping fast, had autopilot, and were very efficient per-mile. It was enough to make up for the assembly/initial quality, material quality and NVH issues in the interior, poor reliability, and for some models, very dated design. Now they're being beaten in almost every category. GM has one of the best fully automatic cruise control systems now; Mercedes has full self driving on the autobahn. Many cars are as or more efficient per-mile, out-accelerate all but the most expensive Teslas, have as fast or faster DC charging systems. The Audi e-tron and Porsche match or out-accelerate them while having top-of-the-market build quality and design; stepping into any modern Porsche is a like stepping into a swiss watch. Lucid's car out-accelerates and screams "FUTURE!" There are a ton of good EVs out or coming out in the next year or two. All of those cars are assembled better, are more reliable, have nicer interiors, less dated designs, are backed by much more extensive dealer/service/parts networks, etc. Ultimately Musk's problem is that he thought he could to better at building cars than companies which have been building cars for a century. The problem wasn't that car companies couldn't do better than Tesla; it's that they didn't want to. Now that EVs are a Thing, they want to. They have more cash, more manufacturing capacity, more R&D, more dealers, better supply chains, and much better relations with the media and automotive press. Tesla is fucked long-term. I suspect Musk's plan is to pivot to being an energy/charging company - that Tesla cars were just a vehicle to get him a worldwide charger network and accompanying infrastructure (it's the one thing that Tesla does just about flawlessly.)
- renzo88 5y ago
  >Tesla is fucked long-term. I suspect Musk's plan is to pivot to being an energy/charging company - that Tesla cars were just a vehicle to get him a worldwide charger network and accompanying infrastructure (it's the one thing that Tesla does just about flawlessly.) This was always my take as well. He wants to make cars (they're a halo product), but the real value of tesla is in skateboards, batteries, charging. I suspect that things like the roadster/cybertruck are tesla preparing to transition to a business model where car sales are not the largest part of their business.
- Sohcahtoa82 5y ago
  > GM has one of the best fully automatic cruise control systems now; Mercedes has full self driving on the autobahn. Compare either of these to Tesla's Autopilot (Which is NOT the same as FSD!). I'd be surprised if there were significant differences. > Many cars are as or more efficient per-mile, Are they, though? I dunno about other cars, but the Taycan is extremely inefficient. The Taycan 4S Performance Battery Plus has a 93 kwh battery, but only 227 mile EPA estimated range. Meanwhile, my Model 3 Performance is 75 kwh, but EPA rated 300 miles. > out-accelerate all but the most expensive Teslas And significantly more expensive. > have as fast or faster DC charging systems That are fewer and farther between, not to mention expensive, and also I'm not sure about the faster part. The latest gen superchargers are up to 250 kW. I can drive on any Interstate highway in the continental USA and not have to worry about where to charge. Even the I-90 corridor across over 1,500 miles of rural highway has enough Superchargers on it to make a road trip viable. That all said... In the long term, you may be right. But we're still 5+ years away from their downfall. The other manufacturers have REALLY been dragging their feet on making good EVs. Honda could be selling tens (or even hundreds) of thousands of fully electric Civics and CRVs, but don't because ????.
  - MBCook 5y ago
    You should look up the new Mercedes system. If you haven’t heard about it it only functions up to like 37 mph, but it’s level three self driving. The kind where the driver doesn’t have to monitor it. So where it can work (map freeways) it can completely take over in slow traffic. Pretty impressive. I agree with you about the 5+ years thing. Ford released an EV that they basically never advertised and got swamped with orders. They announced the next one and got even MORE swamped because it was the F150. They’ve had to delay the introduction of at least two more EV models just to try and keep up with demand for the first two. My understanding is VW has been doing extremely well with the ID.4. I know there is heavy interest in the Kia Niro and the Cadillac Lyriq and of course the new Hummer. Other newcomers like Rivian and Lucid are pulling a lot of eyes/orders. Tesla owned the EV segment because outside the Volt/Bolt/Leaf there was nothing else. Certainly those aren’t equivalent to the S/X/Y or even 3. But the question is, can Tesla improve faster than the rest of the entire automotive industry can move to EVs. I doubt it. In some ways this feels like a double disruption. Tesla came along and disrupted car manufacturing I proving that EVs could work and were even popular/desirable. They also proved online car buying could be quite successful. But I think they will now be disrupted by the companies they tried to replace. I just don’t see how they can hold off every single major car company in the world. They may have the most efficient cars (from my understanding) and they’ve obviously got the whole over the air update thing figured out. But they don’t make enough models to cover everyone’s taste and they still have some real manufacturing/customer service issues that they could have grown a out of by now if they had wanted to. I feel like they may have spread themselves much too thin, and lost their chance at king of the hill because of it. In my mind they’ll never be a VW or Toyota sized car manufacturer in the long term. But will they be as big as Audi? Or just a Jaguar? Or gone like Pontiac? Don’t know. Bankruptcy? Merger? Acquisition? Exit the consumer market? Will be interesting to watch.

Brakenshire 5y ago

Five years ago there was nothing else, but now there are many options.

misiti3780 5y ago

You're missing out, they are making great cars!

renzo88 5y ago
I notice that you said not that "my tesla is great" but that "they are great". Do you own one? I will not purchase a car that has a panel gap I can fit my pinky in. I will not purchase a car that is at the bottom of reliability ratings. I will not purchase a car without radar sensors for the adaptive cruise control. Regardless, I ended up buying a faf bmw and I'm loving it. So I did okay, anyways.
- misiti3780 5y ago
  Yes, 2020 M3 - I have had zero problems in 30K miles. I think there is a misconception that there are a lot of Tesla owners that are not satisfied with their purchases - It seems to me they are a tiny (albeit vocal) minority.

evo_9 5y ago

I find it interesting when people list things like 'panel gap' as a reason they won't buy a car. I grew up in Detroit and honestly it's pretty embarrassing the stuff that goes on with most Big 4 cars. Case in point - my sister worked from one for ~30 years and still gets a 'green sheet discount' so she loyally buys their brand still. it's comical how every time she gets a new car something pretty significant goes wrong within 6 months. This time, her 3 week old Jeep bricked itself because the key fob wouldn't communicate with the car and refused to start. The emergency break also suffered a software failure that refuses to unlock the break. The panel gaps though were spot on. Whew.

renzo88 5y ago
Panel gap matters because it is a clear indicator of manufacturing precision, and it also affects weather proofing. It is a very strong signal (but not the only one!) Most people buy cars based on brands, and also a very substantial amount of car purchases are impulse purchases. Anecdotally, I rented a jeep a few months ago (compass) and it was truly abysmal.
cirrus3 5y ago
Panel gap is expected on crap "most Big 4 cars"

Fatnino 5y ago

Is a mid intersection merge illegal in California? The drivers handbook only says that if you start into an intersection you need to finish crossing. Nothing about what lane.