5 ms·
> You'll have almost no reports of "systemic circulating virus" load, because there's not really an accepted definition for how this measurement would be taken.
by __blockcipher__ 5y ago
> You'll have almost no reports of "systemic circulating virus" load, because there's not really an accepted definition for how this measurement would be taken.
Wait, what? This seems completely at odds with the literal definition of viral load per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_load https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_load:
> Viral load, also known as viral burden, is a numerical expression of the quantity of virus in a given volume of fluid, including biological and environmental specimens.
- mlyle 5y ago> Viral load, also known as viral burden, is a numerical expression of the quantity of virus in a given volume of fluid Yes, in a specific fluid. Grandparent doesn't like viral load data coming from upper respiratory swabs-- preferring some kind of "higher systemic load" number. Well, there's no magical "real systemic" load. You can measure it in the nose; you can measure it (sometimes) in the bloodstream (but this is sporadic and small even in severe cases, though it has prognostic value in critical care). You can measure it in feces, etc.