5 ms·
Well written and presented. Important not to miss out his closing comment: "For teams that have to do formal releases on a longer term interval (a few weeks to
by blackRust 15y ago
Well written and presented. Important not to miss out his closing comment:
"For teams that have to do formal releases on a longer term interval (a few weeks to a few months between releases), and be able to do hot-fixes and maintenance branches and other things that arise from shipping so infrequently, git-flow makes sense and I would highly advocate it’s use.
For teams that have set up a culture of shipping, who push to production every day, who are constantly testing and deploying, I would advocate picking something simpler like GitHub Flow."
So if you fall in the second category, this is a read for you.