6 ms·
> Someone will be left holding the empty bag at the end. I fail to see how this is different than any speculative asset?
by hmrtn 5y ago
> Someone will be left holding the empty bag at the end.
I fail to see how this is different than any speculative asset?
- eqvinox 5y ago> I fail to see how this is different than any speculative asset? To drive home the point from pjc50's sibling post, NFTs are "empty" speculative assets. If you speculate with company stock, housing, or whatever else — there's generally at least some material value that could be liquidated. Even during a bubble when it's overvalued, it's generally not zero. And the cases where it can become zero (companies going completely bankrupt), there's warning signs and possibly even fraud. NFTs just have no backing. Even "fiat money" (frequently said to "only have value because people back it", after gold standards went away) is different since it's backed by some country. NFTs? Nope. Just nothing.
- hoseja 5y agoCountries are just successful memes that pulled up the ladder as well as they could.
- VoodooJuJu 5y ago>Countries Populated with real, physical resources, and real, physical people, who will take real, physical action to secure themselves, their resources, and their ideas. Who is defending my unique set of bits? How are they defended? What is gained from defending them? What is lost if they're not defended?
- pjc50 5y agoThere have historically been attempts to restrict the sale of purely speculative assets to the general public (Howey test, binary options ban etc), because gambling is such a compelling addictive product that people ruin their lives by it.