5 ms·

There’s plenty of precedent for corruption with respect to tax incentives, see, e.g., what Foxconn did in Wisconsin: https://www.theverge.com/21507966/foxconn-

There’s plenty of precedent for corruption with respect to tax incentives, see, e.g., what Foxconn did in Wisconsin: https://www.theverge.com/21507966/foxconn-empty-factories-wisconsin-jobs-loophole-trump https://www.theverge.com/21507966/foxconn-empty-factories-wi... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_in_Wisconsin?wprov=sfti1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_in_Wisconsin?wprov=sft...

scottcodie 5y ago
I'm sorry, am I missing some sort of evidence of corruption for the Samsung plant? Is that a serious accusation?
- aspenmayer 5y ago
  Evidence of corruption in Samsung itself is not hard to find. Absence of evidence of corruption in this specific case is not evidence of corruption’s absence. I remain skeptical of the terms of the deal either way.
  - bradknowles 5y ago
    Evidence of corruption in ERCOT is not hard to find. It would be much harder to find evidence of fair dealing from ERCOT.