17 ms·
Tons, and tons. Telegram has a better user experience as well, both in the quality of the apps, and the way features work. Of course, in some cases, signal is a
by redmare80 5y ago
Tons, and tons. Telegram has a better user experience as well, both in the quality of the apps, and the way features work. Of course, in some cases, signal is a little hamstrung due to their aggressive security model.
Although, I think most of those telegram features are cute little addons and aren't really core to the purpose of the app (messaging).
Personally, I use signal for everything and have gotten my friends on it as well.
- bilal4hmed 5y agoTelegram works EVERYWHERE esp with its web browser support. Signal for some reason tends to ignore Android tablets and ARM on ChromeOS & Windows.
- redmare80 5y agoSignal doesn't have the benefit of resources that telegram does. Also, they have to build their platform out "correctly" the first time, which makes life much harder. It's a noble goal
- ushakov 5y ago> Signal doesn't have the benefit of resources that telegram does which resources does tg have that signal don’t?
- redmare80 5y agoTelegram has investors and revenue streams that far surpass anything Signal has (even with Acton/Marlinspike's generous endowment). This means they can hire more employees. In fact, telegram has more than 10 times the employees and 25 times the funding than signal has.
- hnarn 5y agoPavel Durov is a dollar billionaire, so that’s something.
- bilal4hmed 5y agoMaybe instead of focusing on mobilecoin integration they should work on some of these important things. Their credibility already took a dent because of that