8 ms·
Correct — this is why 9/11 was possible then and impossible now, TSA or no TSA. Source: I’ve traveled on airplanes with some frequency between 1980 and now.
by setpatchaddress 5y ago
Correct — this is why 9/11 was possible then and impossible now, TSA or no TSA. Source: I’ve traveled on airplanes with some frequency between 1980 and now.
- bopbeepboop 5y agoJust to concur: The 9/11 attacks had already been mitigated the morning of 9/11 — when the last plane to go down was taken down when passengers who had heard of the previous attacks tried to regain control. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93 All that was required was that small change in perception.
- ryanlol 5y ago>9/11 was possible then and impossible now pfft, now you have hardened cockpit doors that’ll keep you safe if you manage to SE your way into the cockpit (which at least on long haul flights departing from europe hasn’t been super hard IME) A terror group could just have one of their operatives blow a million dollars on first class flights to achieve some VVIP-status like BA executive premier, then it suddenly becomes really easy to ask for things like seeing the cockpit during takeoff. Or you could just charter a few large private jets, there wouldn’t be any other passengers to fuck you over and you’d be in charge of the fligut route. I guess they’d shoot you down faster these days, but to mitigate that you’d just need to depart from a city airport and make sure they let you in the cockpit early on. I’m absolutely sure there could be a new (single-aircraft) 9/11, and it wouldn’t even be particularly difficult to execute by a group of people that isn’t already under heavy government surveillance.