8 ms·
I argue that the fight needs to start with the most unjustified measures. seat-belts, helmets etc. As long as you have those in place it's only consequential t
by overhero 5y ago
I argue that the fight needs to start with the most unjustified measures. seat-belts, helmets etc.
As long as you have those in place it's only consequential that more protective measures are in place as well - i.e ones that actually do have an protective impact on society
- roenxi 5y agoIf your plan is to start with the least consequential issues, you should reconsider the plan. Start with the important stuff, work down to the nice-to-haves. Nobody gets everything that they want.
- overhero 5y agono, it's not about "least consequential" but about "most unjustified". as long as you have even more unjustified measures in place, you will have a hard time fighting the less unjustified