8 ms·

You're severely underselling Google's incapability, e.g. https://i.imgur.com/UoIZSU2.png https://i.imgur.com/UoIZSU2.png

dylan604 5y ago
WTactualF? When has * ever been anything other than multiplication? Why would the resulting links all be discussing division?
- ALittleLight 5y ago
  I think Google search doesn't include the special symbols, so it's like searching "48 6".
  - johnchristopher 5y ago
    I don't know, I was looking for "how to configure cors for specific vhost in nginx" and all I got was Apache SO links. Had to use -apache.
    - b112 5y ago
      Use verbatim search too. All words must exist without aliasing. (google aliases ubuntu and debian, john/jon/Johnathan for example)
      - _nalply 5y ago
        Sometimes even this doesn't work. I used verbatim search and got back results which didn't contain the word I looked for. I then just sadly wonder how the heck this could be possible and resignedly slowly shake my head. I could wish for a feature where I double-double quote the word to empathically indicate that this word must exist in the result and not left out under any circumstances. But then again I am sure that the search quality will continue to decline and even double-double, triple-quote, quadruple-quote words &c won't help anymore. Sort of a quote inflation.
        b112 5y ago
        The + symbol used to mean this, then some lunatic woman from google explained to everyone it had been removed, but it was OK as quotes were the same. She was either a highly incompetent buffoon, or a liar for PR purposes, as quotes are not the same. Why the change? Because it caused issues with Google+ searches from their new fancy pants Facebook clone. Soon after, due to protest, verbatim was introduced. It was fine for at least 5 years, but someone keeps reducing its effectiveness. Clowns. All I hear is clown music, when I Google search. I mean, who rolls out a product so disjointed that the very search for its users is broken, then like a year later, rolls out a broken fix?! Google, that's who. The product failure king.
      - ghostly_s 5y ago
        >google aliases ubuntu and debian, WHAT the FUCK. Is there a more convenient way to bypass this than "quoting" "every" "word?"
        emmelaich 5y ago
        click tools -> show all results -> verbatim
        dylan604 5y ago
        i just tried this for: 48 * 6 the results after choosing verbatim are even worse
        b112 5y ago
        Verbatim gives no aliasing, interpretation. 48 means 48, not forty eight.
        b112 5y ago
        Yes verbatim search , under search tools after an initial search. Google takes quotes as just stronger suggestions, fyi, but verbatim is supposed to prevent this.
    - faeyanpiraat 5y ago
      I get increasingly frustrated by the spammy SO mirroring spam sites getting into the top 3 results.
      - wott 5y ago
        I recently noticed that a number of SO questions have even been turned into Youtube videos containing a slide-show of the answers, now :-(
        dylan604 5y ago
        I absolutely hate this. Scanning a video is so much more difficult than just scanning a written explanation. If these videos are being monetized, I think that's a problem. If they are, someone could just create a channel by converting SO questions into videos. The question I have is what kind of keywords are people using on these videos that Google feel is more worthwhile than the actual text of a written version of the content? Or is the algo so heavily weighted to pick a youtube link?
        johnchristopher 5y ago
        Having worked a stint in social media for 4 years there was this huge guideline from Facebook to push publishers to churn out videos. I suppose Google ranking algorithm favors Youtube but i don't get Google's reasoning behind that. Engagement because of embedded ads ?
      - johnchristopher 5y ago
        Oh yeah there's that too and now I also get them in other languages than English but they are just Google translate version of SO.
  - thisisnotatest 5y ago
    This is correct. In this query, the '*' is being disregarded. Then, I assume, more people on the internet discuss 48 and 6 in the context of long division than in the context of multiplication.
- stevage 5y ago
  I'm not certain but in this context * may be a wildcard.
  - dylan604 5y ago
    So what you're saying is that google sucks at context clues
    - utopcell 5y ago
      It clearly understands enough to trigger displaying the calculator.
      - dylan604 5y ago
        What we'll discover is there is a team dedicated to determining when to display the calculator. Then there will be another team entirely that picks how to interpret the query for website results. The two teams will never have met, spoken, exchanged information between the two. The team searching websites will mysteriously have never thought that someone might search a webpage for a math equation.
  - ksaj 5y ago
    It is. Try searching for 16*9 for the good reason it shows both the calculator, and then links to 16:9 and 16x9 aspect ratio content. It's reasonable to think that the calculator already answered the question, and I'm not looking for pages on the simple multiplication once I've already seen the answer. Imagine the uproar if those results didn't come up because a bunch of children's math quizzes were found instead.
krisoft 5y ago
I don’t understand the problem. You are asking what is 48*6, and the correct answer is right at the top.

dylan604 5y ago

WTactualF? When has * ever been anything other than multiplication? Why would the resulting links all be discussing division?

ALittleLight 5y ago
I think Google search doesn't include the special symbols, so it's like searching "48 6".
- johnchristopher 5y ago
  I don't know, I was looking for "how to configure cors for specific vhost in nginx" and all I got was Apache SO links. Had to use -apache.
  - b112 5y ago
    Use verbatim search too. All words must exist without aliasing. (google aliases ubuntu and debian, john/jon/Johnathan for example)
    - _nalply 5y ago
      Sometimes even this doesn't work. I used verbatim search and got back results which didn't contain the word I looked for. I then just sadly wonder how the heck this could be possible and resignedly slowly shake my head. I could wish for a feature where I double-double quote the word to empathically indicate that this word must exist in the result and not left out under any circumstances. But then again I am sure that the search quality will continue to decline and even double-double, triple-quote, quadruple-quote words &c won't help anymore. Sort of a quote inflation.
      - b112 5y ago
        The + symbol used to mean this, then some lunatic woman from google explained to everyone it had been removed, but it was OK as quotes were the same. She was either a highly incompetent buffoon, or a liar for PR purposes, as quotes are not the same. Why the change? Because it caused issues with Google+ searches from their new fancy pants Facebook clone. Soon after, due to protest, verbatim was introduced. It was fine for at least 5 years, but someone keeps reducing its effectiveness. Clowns. All I hear is clown music, when I Google search. I mean, who rolls out a product so disjointed that the very search for its users is broken, then like a year later, rolls out a broken fix?! Google, that's who. The product failure king.
    - ghostly_s 5y ago
      >google aliases ubuntu and debian, WHAT the FUCK. Is there a more convenient way to bypass this than "quoting" "every" "word?"
      - emmelaich 5y ago
        click tools -> show all results -> verbatim
        dylan604 5y ago
        i just tried this for: 48 * 6 the results after choosing verbatim are even worse
        b112 5y ago
        Verbatim gives no aliasing, interpretation. 48 means 48, not forty eight.
      - b112 5y ago
        Yes verbatim search , under search tools after an initial search. Google takes quotes as just stronger suggestions, fyi, but verbatim is supposed to prevent this.
  - faeyanpiraat 5y ago
    I get increasingly frustrated by the spammy SO mirroring spam sites getting into the top 3 results.
    - wott 5y ago
      I recently noticed that a number of SO questions have even been turned into Youtube videos containing a slide-show of the answers, now :-(
      - dylan604 5y ago
        I absolutely hate this. Scanning a video is so much more difficult than just scanning a written explanation. If these videos are being monetized, I think that's a problem. If they are, someone could just create a channel by converting SO questions into videos. The question I have is what kind of keywords are people using on these videos that Google feel is more worthwhile than the actual text of a written version of the content? Or is the algo so heavily weighted to pick a youtube link?
        johnchristopher 5y ago
        Having worked a stint in social media for 4 years there was this huge guideline from Facebook to push publishers to churn out videos. I suppose Google ranking algorithm favors Youtube but i don't get Google's reasoning behind that. Engagement because of embedded ads ?
    - johnchristopher 5y ago
      Oh yeah there's that too and now I also get them in other languages than English but they are just Google translate version of SO.
- thisisnotatest 5y ago
  This is correct. In this query, the '*' is being disregarded. Then, I assume, more people on the internet discuss 48 and 6 in the context of long division than in the context of multiplication.
stevage 5y ago
I'm not certain but in this context * may be a wildcard.
- dylan604 5y ago
  So what you're saying is that google sucks at context clues
  - utopcell 5y ago
    It clearly understands enough to trigger displaying the calculator.
    - dylan604 5y ago
      What we'll discover is there is a team dedicated to determining when to display the calculator. Then there will be another team entirely that picks how to interpret the query for website results. The two teams will never have met, spoken, exchanged information between the two. The team searching websites will mysteriously have never thought that someone might search a webpage for a math equation.
- ksaj 5y ago
  It is. Try searching for 16*9 for the good reason it shows both the calculator, and then links to 16:9 and 16x9 aspect ratio content. It's reasonable to think that the calculator already answered the question, and I'm not looking for pages on the simple multiplication once I've already seen the answer. Imagine the uproar if those results didn't come up because a bunch of children's math quizzes were found instead.

krisoft 5y ago

I don’t understand the problem. You are asking what is 48*6, and the correct answer is right at the top.