8 ms·
That completely ignores leaving the gold standard... which was necessitated by... runaway govt spending
by snomad 5y ago
That completely ignores leaving the gold standard... which was necessitated by... runaway govt spending
- gumby 5y agoActually it wasn’t. The national debt had been falling for a few years when Nixon took the US off the gold standard. This was even discussed on HN in the past few days.
- User23 5y agoBy that time, gold redemptions were mainly available only to foreign entities. Unlike all other forms of money[1], only US federal government spending, in cooperation with the Fed, could create new reserves[2]. That there were too many reserves in foreign hands chasing $35 an ounce gold could only be the result of US federal spending. Therefore while foreign demand was the proximate cause, it was definitely a downstream consequence. The size of the US government's outstanding liabilities at the time isn't relevant, what affects prices is money flows, not stocks. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply#United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply#United_States [2] Back then the Fed wasn't willing to just expand its own balance sheet significantly on its own initiative as it is now.