9 ms·
Not just in-memory. It's pretty convenient if you have a set of Parquet files with common schema. Fairly snappy and doesn't have to fit in memory.
by catawbasam 5y ago
Not just in-memory.
It's pretty convenient if you have a set of Parquet files with common schema. Fairly snappy and doesn't have to fit in memory.
- jamesrr39 5y agoI'm using duckdb for querying parquet files as well. It's an awesome tool, so nice to just "look into" parquet files with SQL.
- deshpand 5y agoMany enterprises are coming up with patterns where they replicate the data from the database (say Redshift) into parquet files (data lake?) and directing more traffic including analytical workloads onto the parquet files. duckdb will be very useful here, instead of having to use Redshift Spectrum or whatever.