7 ms·
Since the F# transpiles into JS at runtime it's really no different than, say, TS in terms of performance concerns. Unless you meant something else there?
by isaacabraham79 5y ago
Since the F# transpiles into JS at runtime it's really no different than, say, TS in terms of performance concerns.
Unless you meant something else there?
- eatonphil 5y agoI mean that the marketing around "happiness" doesn't directly address any concerns that developers should have when evaluating a library. At best it's indirect if you assume that happiness means performance, but that's a big assumption. So I'd rather marketing just say exactly what it's direct goals are rather than indirect ones like happiness. > Since the F# transpiles into JS at runtime it's really no different than, say, TS in terms of performance concerns. But as a particular point, this is hard to believe. TS tries to have no (or a minimal) runtime component whereas F# definitely must have a major runtime component.