6 ms·
This makes sense. If the EPA is slacking and rubber-stamping things, that warrants investigation and criticism. But I'm not buying the angle that the FAA shou
by speedybird 5y ago
This makes sense. If the EPA is slacking and rubber-stamping things, that warrants investigation and criticism. But I'm not buying the angle that the FAA should be expected to enforce the EPA's rules. That's what the EPA is for.
- criley2 5y agoThe EPA was utterly gutted over the past 4 years. The sad part is that it takes much longer to rebuild than it does to tear down. The EPA being unable or unwilling to enforce environmental protections is by design.
- reddog 5y agoUtterly gutted? How do you figure? The EPA headcount was 14,779 in 2016 and was 14,172 in 2020. https://www.epa.gov/planandbudget/budget https://www.epa.gov/planandbudget/budget
- speedybird 5y agoSupposing the EPA is gutted as you suggest (my sibling comment suggests otherwise), it surely still has more capability and expertise when it comes to environmental regulation than the FAA. I think expecting the FAA to act as a surrogate EPA is expecting too much.