8 ms·
Lisp is definitely not as functional as for instance Haskell is. Side-effect-freeness was never really a topic for Lispers.
by mlang23 5y ago
Lisp is definitely not as functional as for instance Haskell is. Side-effect-freeness was never really a topic for Lispers.
- medo-bear 5y agoYou are right, Lisp is far more versatile. There is even a statically-typed language Coalton [1] embedded into Lisp. [1] https://coalton-lang.github.io/20211010-introducing-coalton/ https://coalton-lang.github.io/20211010-introducing-coalton/