6 ms·
Why invest into something that will only last 100 years in fuel, take 30k years to deconstruct and may blow into your face at every point in time. Sounds insane
by proctrap 5y ago
Why invest into something that will only last 100 years in fuel, take 30k years to deconstruct and may blow into your face at every point in time. Sounds insane.
- zizee 5y agoCan you provide more info around nuclear fuel running out in 100 years? I had been thinking we had an abundance of nuclear fuel available tIo us. I have not heard of a 100 year limit before and am interested to learn more.
- adfrhgeaq5hy 5y agoNuclear reactors cannot explode. It is not physically possible. It isn't even close to physically possible. Reactor-grade uranium is about 5% U235 while you need >90% to make something that can explode. May as well ask why we use wind turbines when they might take off and start dropping napalm.
- cesarb 5y ago> Nuclear reactors cannot explode. It is not physically possible. It isn't even close to physically possible. They can and they do (see: Chernobyl, Fukushima). But it's not a nuclear explosion (as you say, it's not possible with their fuel enrichment and geometry); it's a steam or hydrogen explosion.
- adfrhgeaq5hy 5y agoLots of things can go wrong and I certainly don't intend to downplay the risks. Mismanagement like at Fukushima or Chernobyl can do a lot of harm. But there are a lot of people who think a nuclear reactor can level a city, which is totally impossible.