5 ms·
Not sure how that has anything to do with my comment. I’ll repeat it: the primary reasons which caused Japan to become “imperialist” are directly tied to Weste
by disneygibson 5y ago
Not sure how that has anything to do with my comment.
I’ll repeat it: the primary reasons which caused Japan to become “imperialist” are directly tied to Western imperialism. The Japanese emperor was mostly a political symbolic figurehead that united the Japanese islands, not a Roman emperor or British monarch intent on conquering the world.
This is all basic Japanese history.
- suction 5y agoOh, it has everything to do with it. I don't understand how you couldn't see that, immediately, so I don't think further explanation would help you.
- Gupie 5y agoAre you forgetting the 1592 Japanese invasions of Korea which had the intent of conquering the Korean Peninsula and then the whole of China?
- numpad0 5y agoI don’t think he is. Not even Korean right wings blame emperors for that invasion. By all intents and purposes it is Hideyoshi’s invasion.
- Gupie 5y agoMy comment was in response to his assertion that "the primary reasons which caused Japan to become imperialist are directly tied to Western imperialism".
- numpad0 5y agoThese are indeed matters of basic Japanese history as GP claims, although I’m not too sure whether “basic Japanese history” is actually common knowledges except for Japanese history majors or someone who has gone through Japanese compulsory education. Wikipedia article on Shogun[1] has a nice quick summary on pre-modern Shogunate system. It’s similar to British constitutional monarchy in a sense: the emperor was to delegate all power to the government and was to remain within instructions and supervisions of the government. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogun https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogun