5 ms·
These transactions are not occurring on the bitcoin network - they are occurring on the lightning network which is a second layer on top of the base bitcoin lay
by Centmo 5y ago
These transactions are not occurring on the bitcoin network - they are occurring on the lightning network which is a second layer on top of the base bitcoin layer. Transactions here are virtually free and use virtually no energy. This is how bitcoin scales for many small transactions.
- kd913 5y agoTransactions on the lightning network have difficulty scaling because each node needs to what compute the entire graph/nodes and setup channels? A problem which scales even worse the more nodes in play. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoincash/comments/8n9xbp/why_the_lightning_network_doesnt_scale/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoincash/comments/8n9xbp/why_the...
- panarky 5y agoThe lightning node running on my Raspberry Pi doesn't have any trouble finding routes so it can't be too compute-intensive. Most transactions settle in two seconds or less for a fraction of a cent in fees.
- stimpson_j_cat 5y agoThe only knowledge you have of the lightning network is a YouTube video from 3 years ago posted on a subreddit with a financial interest in badmouthing BTC?
- NicoJuicy 5y agoSo, what is not correct in the video?
- 0x000000001 5y agoPretty much all of it
- NicoJuicy 5y agoSpecify
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- stimpson_j_cat 5y agoLN has 75k channels right now and 3k BTC locked https://1ml.com/ https://1ml.com/ Did the GP provide any specific reason why LN can't scale other than "here's a link to youtube from 2018?"
- NicoJuicy 5y agoI'm not really sure if this is the proof I'm looking for. The author of the video was explaining how the LN works and it seems to be an exponential routing calculation problem ( similar to traveling salesman ) So while it could work for 75 k channels, it's not going to work for 1 million. If the explanation of that video is correct (since you didn't disagree that), then how many channels it has now is irrelevant from my POV.
- NicoJuicy 5y agoFound this, so i believe it's still a valid problem: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16155835 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16155835
- duud 5y agoIf I want to remit US$100 from the US to someone in El Salvador and they want USD cash, how much is going to be left after all is said and done?
- anonomousename 5y agoOn the original network - about an hour and a half and ~$9. On the lightning network (layer 2) it would be about $0.09 and take less than a minute.
- nextaccountic 5y agoAn hour and a half? But there are new blocks every 10 minutes!
- jakopo87 5y agoTransactions are confirmed when they are at least 6 blocks deep to avoid double spending. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Confirmation https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Confirmation
- nextaccountic 5y agoConfirmed by who? Coinbase currently requires only 3 confirmations[0]. Binance requires only 1 confirmation for deposits and 2 for withdraw[1]. Actually. Was there a successful double spend in Bitcoin ever? I mean, this kind of attack can't be done in secret, right? Such attack wold immediately make the news, because the blockchain is public. And to pull it off you need a substantial % of the mining capacity, so only a handful entities in world can coordinate such high hashrate attack. It just doesn't seem very likely, and specially not if you're just reversing a low value retail purchase. I'd wager the rate of counterfeit money you receive when dealing with cash is way higher. [0] https://help.coinbase.com/en/coinbase/getting-started/crypto-education/bitcoin-glossary https://help.coinbase.com/en/coinbase/getting-started/crypto... "Coinbase requires 3 confirmations to consider a bitcoin transaction final." [1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/binance-cuts-time-needed-btc-101118595.html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/binance-cuts-time-needed-btc-...