6 ms·
Nothing this “whistleblower” has said is revelatory… she’s stating things we already know. The question should be “why now?”.
by jtdev 5y ago
Nothing this “whistleblower” has said is revelatory… she’s stating things we already know. The question should be “why now?”.
- zestyping 5y agoHere's what's new: she is explaining the situation to politicians of both parties in terms of the perverse incentive structure at Facebook, and successfully diverting the conversation away from whether it should censor more Democratic or Republican content, toward the real issue: that no one has both the resources and the information to assess and improve safety on the platform.
- tibyat 5y agoThis was the cynic's response to Snowden, too. Hard to argue he didn't make a large and positive impact in the end, so I'm willing to give this a chance too.