4 ms·

There were plenty of media outlets that doubted the WMD story. There’s no widespread collision between media and government.

• dleslie 5y ago
  Yeah, it's not as though there weren't protests against the invasion, and widespread media coverage thereof.
  • babesh 5y ago
    And all the protests accomplished jackshit. Can't you see that that is the point? Your opinion and protests have no effect. Your protests are just plausible deniability. https://youtu.be/UqMaYuVvqGo https://youtu.be/UqMaYuVvqGo Weapons of mass destruction LOL
    • dleslie 5y ago
      The protests failed to invigorate change, not unlike anti mask protests today, because the message wasn't persuasive enough to sufficiently many people. That's democracy. It's not great, but it's better than the alternatives.
      • babesh 5y ago
        Entrenched special interests driving policy is what the US is. Even an erstwhile democracy can fall into a stuck state. Democracies can be perverted and also have a history of destroying themselves. See Greek history.
        • dleslie 5y ago
          Still better than totalitarianism or fascism.
• babesh 5y ago
  Nope. All the major outlets were pushing it. ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox. Also go find out how many representatives were for the war. https://web.archive.org/web/20190823053520/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/congress-says-yes-to-iraq-resolution/ https://web.archive.org/web/20190823053520/https://www.cbsne... 296-133, 77-23
  • dleslie 5y ago
    There's nothing shocking about that many representatives voting in favor of something that had over two thirds public support. In fact, it looks appropriate. As for the media, the foreign and public press weren't so in favor. But I'll be the last to suggest that American media isn't terrible. It is.